High Court visits a parallel universe

High Court visits a parallel universe

03 March 2012 By Lawyers Weekly

A High Court hearing took an interdimensional detour in the recent case of Lane v Morrison & Anor. As reported by GreenGrads and GreenGrads and David Starkoff's blog, this rather unusual argument was originally presented to the High Court in January:

MR STREET: We say in relation to ground 3 that we have put forward that that raises the existence of what I will call the parallel universe. ... We say that Ground 3 challenges the existence of the universe.

FRENCH CJ: Let us not get lost in the metaphor.

Advertisement
Advertisement

At the hearing before the full court on April 22, Justice Gummow couldn't resist dipping back into the exciting prospects of a parallel dimensions.

GUMMOW J: So notions of accumulation are rather confusing really. You are in parallel universes; you are not in cumulative universes, if I can stretch things that way.

MR GAGELER: Your Honour, I got into this debate with Mr Street.

HAYNE J: Professor Hawking is very ill at the moment.

MR GAGELER: Your Honour, metaphors are probably unhelpful.

SPONSORED CONTENT

Fortunately, avid science fiction fan Chief Justice French (who infamously used clips from Sylvester Stallone Sci Fi classic film Judge Dredd to illustrate one of his 2008 speeches) was able to steer the Court firmly back on course.

FRENCH CJ: Mr Street has been there before and we tried to usher him out of the parallel universes.

High Court visits a parallel universe
Intro image
lawyersweekly logo
The Women in Law Awards is the benchmark for excellence, recognising the empowering women influencing the Australian legal profession, celebrating the female leaders, role models and future champions of the industry. Register for the waitlist today for the opportunity to attend this remarkable awards ceremony and network with top legal professionals and fellow peers.
Visit womeninlaw.com.au