SME Law

Bradman accuses Allens of taking the Mickey

Solicitors for Donald Bradman's son John Bradman have filed a statement of claim in the Supreme Court of South Australia, seeking damages against national law firm Allens Arthur Robinson. The…

August 03, 2009 • By Lawyers Weekly

Share this article on:

Facebook

Solicitors for Donald Bradman's son John Bradman have filed a statement of claim in the Supreme Court of South Australia, seeking damages against national law firm Allens Arthur Robinson.

This content is available exclusively to Lawyers Weekly premium members.

INDIVIDUAL

Yearly

$ 49.00

per year

SUBSCRIBE NOW

INDIVIDUAL

Monthly

$ 5.00

per month

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Learn more about Premium Benefits and other offers

Username or Email

Password Forgot password?

Keep me signed in on this device.

The firm is being sued for alleged failures of "due care, skill and diligence" in the assignment of the legendary cricketer's name.

Allens represented The Bradman Foundation on a pro bono basis, and licensed use of the name to support Bowral's Bradman Museum and Bradman Trust.

Three years ago the foundation licensed food company Unibic to market "Bradman" chocolate chip cookies in India.

VIEW ALL

The family described Bradman as "a loved and missed family member, not a brand name like Mickey Mouse".

Tags

Deals

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today