Too many lawyers spoil the take

Too many lawyers spoil the take

03 March 2012 By Lawyers Weekly

Most lawyers would be unfamiliar with clients reacting joyously at the minimal size of their legal bill, but one firm in Massachusetts has managed to earn the ire of not just a client but also…

Most lawyers would be unfamiliar with clients reacting joyously at the minimal size of their legal bill, but one firm in Massachusetts has managed to earn the ire of not just a client but also its local supreme court.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A family in Massachusetts, reports abovethelaw.com, objected to the plethora of legal talent that had been at work on their probate estate case when the bill was presented to them by law firm K&L Gates. They had been charged legal fees of $US800,000 ($896,585) to settle a probate estate of $US1.2 billion - a fee the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled was for a lot of "unnecessary lawyering".

The Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Docket reported: In a ruling in the Matter of the Estate of Bartley J. King ... Justice Margot Botsford wrote for a unanimous court that "a total of eighteen attorneys and paralegals were representing [the client], a remarkable number especially when one takes into account the motion judge's view that the theories advanced by the contestants were not 'overly complex'."

SPONSORED CONTENT

Folklaw figures the judge interpreted it as a case of overkill rather than overskill.

Too many lawyers spoil the take
Intro image
lawyersweekly logo
The Women in Law Awards is the benchmark for excellence, recognising the empowering women influencing the Australian legal profession, celebrating the female leaders, role models and future champions of the industry. Register for the waitlist today for the opportunity to attend this remarkable awards ceremony and network with top legal professionals and fellow peers.
Visit womeninlaw.com.au