find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Tax talk splits NSW Bar

Tax talk splits NSW Bar

Both sides of the incorporation debate have told Lawyers Weekly that tax advice regarding incorporation favours their argument.

Both sides of the incorporation debate have told Lawyers Weekly that tax advice regarding incorporation favours their argument.

The proponents of incorporation have claimed that its opponents have overstated the danger of incorporated barristers having their tax benefits cancelled by Part 4A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.

Brendan Sullivan SC from 10th Floor Selborne & Wentworth Chambers played down the impact of Part 4A, claiming that tax law is replete with rules to prevent professional practitioners from obtaining inappropriate tax benefits from incorporation.

“Under the current tax landscape in Australia it cannot be said to be inappropriate for professionals to practise through incorporated entities,” he wrote in an email viewed by Lawyers Weekly.

Tax lawyer Chris Catt (pictured) of 5 Selborne Chambers added that the application of Part 4A will be determined on a case-by-case, not a catch-all, basis.

“If there is an avoidance of tax, it depends on how the barrister conducts himself once he has incorporated his practice, so the decision to incorporate is unlikely to be, of itself, tax avoidance, if the barrister takes out what is considered to be an appropriate salary and makes payments that are deductible in the company for running their practice,” he explained.

Such views, however, do not appear to sway the opponents of incorporation, many of whom still cite advice that warns of possible legal ramifications.

Phillip Boulten SC, president of the NSW Bar Association, stood by advice from Tony Slater QC and other prominent silks that Part 4A “looms large and is a problem that cannot be ignored”, when speaking to Lawyers Weekly.


Talking tax is taxing

As the debate intensifies, a Sydney-based QC and taxation expert is claiming that the tax implications of incorporation are irrelevant.

David Russell QC told Lawyers Weekly that he is disappointed that the discussion over whether barristers be permitted to incorporate is focused on tax when the real issue is whether the public interest is served by incorporation.

“It is wrong for the supporters to claim it is a tax panacea and it is wrong for opponents to claim it is a tax disaster,” he said.

Despite such senior barristers seeking to shift the debate, tax continues to dominate the discussion on both sides.

John Hyde Page from 5 Selborne Chambers, a vocal supporter of incorporation, has slammed the claims made by the opponents of incorporation.

“They say there are no benefits in incorporation, but there are benefits. They say that incorporating a company is tax avoidance, but it is not. No politician in Canberra would ever try to get away with such absurd claims,” he told Lawyers Weekly.

Hyde Page also criticised a comment made by a member of one of the Bar’s professional conduct committees that incorporation is a tax scheme and a professional conduct committee would be bound to treat any barrister who engages in a tax scheme as having engaged in professional misconduct. The assertion has been confirmed by two other barristers who attended a public seminar at Maurice Byers Chambers.

Members will vote on the proposed changes at a general meeting of the Bar Association that has been called for 5.15pm on Tuesday 17 September.

Lawyers Weekly exclusively reported last week (28 August) that opponents of incorporation made an unsuccessful attempt to exclude more than 200 proxy votes from a ballot on whether barristers are allowed to practise through single-member corporate entities.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Tax talk splits NSW Bar
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...