find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Reworking the system

Reworking the system

Reworking the system

Forging paths to change creates an uncomfortable haze of uncertainty for the establishment under threat, making the move to privately operated Family Law Courts a paradigm shift desperately needed, writes Peter Magee.

The events of time have changed from when the Family Law Act of 1975 was enacted to its amendment in 1991 for mediation and arbitration to now. Relationships and the society have evolved through a world of differing times and thinking and acceptability – 2017 is a different era to the act Justice Murphy and the federal Labor government envisaged 42 years ago.

Time stands still for no one where once divorce was unheard of in Australia, to where now divorce accounts for one in every three marriages breaking down.

Redefining a movement and adding new perspective to a way of thinking requires progressive strategies and a want to introduce change for benefit.

Under the current system, cases sit languishing in limbo with a backlog of disputes not or partially heard equating to three to four years.

Backing the rise of an innovative way to deal with a problem that is sure to get only worse delivers untold benefits to all parties in marital disputes, especially the children who are growing up in a system under siege.

Opening a new pathway to halve the backlog of cases awaiting trial and negate lawyers stonewalling cases requires the federal government to be bold and progressive in how it incorporates privatising the Family Law Courts as part of its overall review.

Recently, the government announced a comprehensive review of the family law system by the Australian Law Reform Commission and upon making the announcement, Senator Brandis suggested greater emphasis on ‘collaborative’ solutions – he meant settlements or mediation outcomes.

This does nothing to address cases that can’t be resolved through settlement or mediation, and provides cases where delay allows for an advantage to sit among those cases and not settle until the 11th hour.

Arbitration, in contrast to mediation, involves hearing both sides and making a decision, much like a court does, except it is done privately with the parties paying for the cost of the arbitrator and venue.

Arbitration, unlike mediation, has been almost non-existent since its introduction to the Family Law Act 27 years ago.

Unless the government injects significant funds into family law annually to reduce the backlog and maintain the system, a healthy Alternate Dispute Resolution system that has arbitration as a cornerstone is the only viable alternative.

If the government and the court would turn its attention to putting in place a robust set of rules overcoming the problems identified, the legal profession would respond to provide the resourcing and advice to clients that would change the landscape of family law.

If the legislative and court rules framework were in place, legal firms would offer arbitration services which would provide clients a forum to have their say in a court-like environment, the safeguards of legal advisers and the evidence of both sides tested, a transcript available for the parties to review and if necessary available for any appeal and a result within 90 days of commencing the process.

Furthermore, it reduces the backlog flushing out all cases using delay tactics, so that cases are decided on their merits as early as possible.

The question remains, why would people pay for a private arbitration when they can have access to a judge in the existing court system without being charged for that service?

In the current system, delays cost money whether or not they are legally represented. As disputes drag while the wheels of justice turn, there are court fees, expert reports, more court appearances, ongoing communication and every resource that goes into the fight rack up the cost for those involved.

While the upfront cost of arbitration may seem significant, it pales into comparison with the cost of having the court make a decision in several years’ time when all is taken into account.

Peter Magee is the managing partner and founder of Armstrong Legal and head of the Family Law division.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Reworking the system
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Law Council of Australia
Nov 21 2017
LCA calls for urgent adoption of ‘game-changing’ recommendation
The Law Council of Australia has urged for the immediate adoption of a key recommendation put forwar...
Sally Wheeler
Nov 20 2017
ANU College of Law appoints new dean
A distinguished legal academic and the former head of law of a higher education institution in Irela...
Violence
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...