You have 0 free articles left this month.

Lawyers Weekly - legal news for Australian lawyers

Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Big Law

Lead plaintiff asks for $110k for strip search that was ‘akin to sexual assault’

Lawyers for the NSW strip-search class action told a court the lead plaintiff was entitled to more than $100,000 in damages for being subjected to a search that was “akin to sexual assault”.

May 06, 2025 By Naomi Neilson
expand image

Between 2016 and 2022, officers from NSW Police attended music festivals to allegedly use their “extraordinary” strip-searching powers to conduct examinations “en masse as a matter of routine”, the NSW Supreme Court was told during the first day of class action proceedings.

In opening submissions, Kylie Nomchong SC said lead plaintiff Raya Meredith was asked to “strip, expose all parts of her body, drop her breasts, bend over and expose her anus and vagina” to an officer.

Nomchong said this was “akin to things that would happen during a sexual assault” and asked that the court award Meredith a “significant” sum so the state of NSW would feel the “sting” of the wrongdoing.

The court was told that Meredith was not asked for consent, had been questioned during the search, and was threatened to be thrown out of the 2018 Splendour in the Grass festival if she did not comply.

At one stage during the examination, a male officer walked into the cubicle unannounced and saw Meredith in a “humiliating position”.

Meredith returned to the festival “utterly shocked and degraded”. No drugs were discovered during the examination.

“This is an extraordinary story, but not an isolated one. It is a claim at the most serious end of the scale, but not the most serious,” Nomchong said.

The state of NSW admitted there was “no lawful justification” for Meredith’s search and conceded her version of events was correct.

However, the admission was made two and a half years after the proceedings were lodged, and Nomchong said Meredith was entitled to damages for having this “hanging over her head”.

Despite the admission, Nomchong said there would still need to be factual findings made, including whether the search occurred in a private area, if Meredith was asked to remove more clothes than reasonably necessary, and whether directions that she move her own body parts were just as unlawful as if the officer had done so.

For general damages for battery, assault and false imprisonment, Nomchong said Meredith was entitled to $50,000.

A further $30,000 should be awarded for aggravated damages because the case satisfies the common law test of amounting to special humiliation suffered by the plaintiff, which Nomchong said was “akin to things that would happen during a sexual assault”.

Exemplary damages, to punish the state for overriding the plaintiff’s legislative rights, was assessed around $30,000.

Naomi Neilson

Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly. 

You can email Naomi at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today
Got a tip for us?
If you have any news tips or stories to share, feel free to send them our way.
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company