You have 0 free articles left this month.
Big Law

Gender pay gap persists as top firms slide backwards

New gender pay gap data reveals an uneven pace of reform across the legal profession, with several of the worst-performing firms sliding further backwards within just 12 months.

March 03, 2026 By Naomi Neilson
Share this article on:
expand image

Of the 90 law firms that reported to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) between 2024–25, just under three-quarters had a total remuneration gap higher than the national average of 11.2 per cent.

When compared to the 2023–24 reporting period, 39 per cent had a worse gap, with some increasing between 5.2 and 12.3 percentage points.

 
 

However, some firms demonstrated a marked improvement, and others have continued to see their gap decrease year on year.

These averages are required of all workplaces with 100 or more employees under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, in addition to median gender pay gaps, their workforce composition and remuneration by pay quartile. Lawyers Weekly has provided all data below.

Top-performing firms prioritising gender equity

The top-performing legal services include Lavan, Lawyers On Demand (LOD), Pinsent Masons, and Environmental Defenders Office (EDO), with gaps that were either non-existent or well below the national average.

A spokesperson with Lavan told Lawyers Weekly it was “deeply committed” to driving change around gender equity, and the results were “an encouraging sign” that its initiatives were having a significant impact.

“While we recognise that there is still more work to be done, we are motivated by the progress we have made and remain dedicated to continuing our efforts to achieve true gender equity,” they said.

Paul Cowling, Australian managing director of LOD, said diversity and inclusion have been central, and he was delighted to see “continued year-on-year improvement”, particularly in comparison to other services.

In 2023–24, LOD reported an average total remuneration gap of 3.8 per cent and an average base salary gap of 1.6 per cent. The new data saw these figures decrease to 1.2 and 0.7 per cent, respectively.

“Our improved results reflect our longstanding commitment to an inclusive workplace where gender equality is embedded in how we operate, and to demonstrate that sustainable, equitable careers are possible in ‘NewLaw’,” Cowling said.

Pinsent Masons’ head of human resources for APAC, Caroline Clark, said the firm has taken “deliberate steps” over a number of years to ensure their staff have equal opportunities to progress and be recognised.

This has paid off significantly, with the firm improving its results from the 2023–24 average total remuneration gap of 12.8 per cent down to 2.7 per cent. Its average base salary also decreased from 12.9 to 1.9 per cent.

Clark said: “These results reflect the impact of that ongoing work and our commitment to building a fair, inclusive and equitable workplace for all.”

The EDO, sitting just below Pinsent Masons with a 3.7 per cent average total remuneration gap, said gender equality was crucial for environmental sustainability and the firm was committed to wage equality for staff.

“Women and girls often face disproportionate impacts of climate change and, according to the OECD, their participation in decision making is linked to better environmental outcomes,” CEO Jo Shulman said.

Jackie Mead, CEO of Knowmore Legal Service, said the organisation believes equity must start “within our own walls” if it is to continue supporting those who have experienced profound injustice.

Recognising the “work is not finished”, Mead said the firm would continue to further strengthen policies, systems, and practices to ensure all staff, regardless of their gender, are valued and paid fairly.

“We want to demonstrate to the sector, and the wider community, that closing the gender pay gap is both achievable and essential.

“Knowmore will continue to lead by example and remain transparent about our progress. We hope our results encourage other organisations to prioritise equal pay as a core part of building safe, just, and inclusive workplaces,” Mead told Lawyers Weekly.

Much like Pinsent Masons, Turks saw a marked improvement in its figures; decreasing from its average total remuneration gap of 12 per cent in 2023–24 to the current gap of 4.6 per cent. As for average base salary, the firm improved from the 12 per cent figure down to 5.2 per cent.

Reflecting on these results, CEO Zoe Leonard said the position has always been clear: “Pay, development and advancement must be based on skills, performance and experience – never gender.”

“Led from the top, with a female CEO, HoO, and board chair, our strategy is shaped by visible leadership accountability and a clear commitment to equity in practice,” Leonard added.

“These results reflect the collective accountability of our people in reinforcing values grounded in connectedness, integrity, and opportunity for all.”

Arnold Bloch Leibler director of human resources Shaneen Argall said the firm was also proud of its results, having been deliberate in ensuring equitable remuneration and support for its female lawyers.

Argall said: “Ongoing focus and accountability remain essential as we collectively strive to close the gender pay gap across the profession.”

At Dentons, Australia chair and Australasia region CEO Amber Warren said the 5.8 per cent average total remuneration gap was a result of a number of initiatives, including annual remuneration audits, inclusive role pathways, and the creation of a “strong pipeline of high-calibre female talent” to enable the firm to promote more women.

“We’re proud of our achievement, which is a testament to our commitment to inclusion and the efforts of everyone at Dentons,” Warren said.

A spokesperson with Kennedy's Australian partnership said: "This welcome milestone reflects sustained and deliberate action at Kennedys to increase female representation at senior levels, support career progression through mentorship and sponsorship programmes, and enhance flexibility to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities to success. While it marks meaningful progress, we remain committed to further reducing this gap."

Firms at bottom end explain data discrepancies

The top five firms with the worst gender pay gap for average total remuneration in 2023–24: Spruson & Ferguson, Jones Day, Coleman Greig, Davies Collison Cave, and Meridian Lawyers – remained at the bottom in the figures released on Tuesday, 3 March. However, three of these firms have made some progress in closing their gaps.

Davies Collison Cave (DCC) – which reported a 52.8 per cent average total remuneration gap – said the firm “remains fully committed” to taking deliberate steps to reduce these figures and improve outcomes.

Explaining the large figure, the firm said its highest-paid fee earners are patent attorneys with a master’s degree in intellectual property law and a PhD in science or engineering, which are typically male-dominated.

DCC group director Michael Wolnizer said the firm would continue to prioritise long-term strategies to increase the representation of women in senior and higher-paid roles, which would see those figures decrease.

“We know that this will require long-term, sustained effort and we are committed to delivering on our strategy to improving gender equality outcomes at Davies Collison Cave,” Wolnizer said.

Spruson & Ferguson similarly require intellectual property experts and cited the underrepresentation of women in STEM-qualified roles.

“Spruson & Ferguson is committed to improving gender equity through IPH’s Gender Equity and Equality Strategy, our 40:40:20 representation targets, enhanced parental leave, flexible work practices, and our firm-level development initiatives. Addressing the structural drivers of gender imbalance remains a long‑term priority for the group,” it said.

WGEA CEO Mary Wooldridge was also clear that some companies will have to “go backwards before they go forwards”. Using airlines as an example, Wooldridge said women would need to be first hired into junior roles and rise through the ranks to pilot before the data will improve.

“Going backwards is not necessarily a problem if it’s part of a bigger plan,” Wooldridge said at a press event for media.

Coleman Greig executive chair Caroline Hutchinson said the WGEA does not measure equal pay, which she said was a “critical benchmark of fairness”. She said the firm has robust policies and procedures to ensure employees in equivalent roles are paid fairly, regardless of gender.

Hutchinson added the firm has 71 per cent of women in legal cadet roles, and it would continue to offer targeted development programs, paid parental leave, and flexible working policies to retain female talent.

“As a firm, we take our responsibility to gender pay equality seriously.

“We have comprehensive, board-endorsed strategies in place to drive long-term change, and we are committed to continuing this progress,” she said.

On top of adopting a similar explanation as Coleman Greig, Jones Day said a look at its mid-level and senior associates demonstrated that its firm has median pay gaps in favour of its women employees.

Jones Day’s partner-in-charge of the Brisbane office, Annie Leeks, said that with almost half of the firm’s 40 offices headed up by women, women are “thriving”.

Meridian Lawyers managing director Paul Baker said the firm also has pay parity at comparable role levels across the firm, with its gender pay gap driven by the composition of its most senior leadership cohort.

“We also recognise that explaining a gap is not the same as addressing it.

“Encouragingly, our gap has narrowed since 2023 and continues to trend downward. In the most recent reporting period, the past five team members promoted to principal were women, as were 74 per cent of all promotions across the business,” Baker said.

Cornwalls, which reported an average total remuneration gap of 40.9 per cent, disputed that there was a gender pay gap at the firm.

Sofie Filippone, chief people and operating officer at Cornwalls, said much the same as the other firms: the gap reflects the composition at different cohort levels.

“That said, we are focused on accelerating change within our firm.

“We have implemented targeted initiatives to strengthen progression pathways for women. We are committed to measurable progress and ongoing transparency as we work to improve representation at senior levels,” Filippone told Lawyers Weekly.

Macpherson Kelley had one of the highest figures when WGEA data was first released for the 2023–24 period, but has steadily improved. For example, in the new data, its median total remuneration improved from 41 per cent to 37.2 per cent, and its median base from 39.7 to 34.1 per cent.

If the principal lawyer figures are removed, Macpherson Kelley’s legal practice gender pay gap is reduced to 8.5 per cent.

The firm continued to invest in programs to support women, the majority of its early-career lawyers are women, and it has committed to having women comprise 50 per cent of its principal lawyer positions by 2028.

Below are the results of the average total remuneration and base salary gender pay gaps for the last two reporting periods. Eight firms did not provide data for the 2023–24 period. The 2023–24 reporting period was the first time the average results were published.

2024–25 2023–24
FIRM Average total remuneration on GPG (%) Average base salary GPG (%) Average total remuneration on GPG (%) Average base salary GPG (%) Progress
Kennedys (Australasia) Partnership -5.7 -4.9 13.8 14.7 Improved
Lavan -2.3 -3.7 29 27.5 Improved
Marsdens Law Group -1.6 -1.6 N/A N/A N/A
Lawyers on Demand 1.2 0.7 3.8 1.6 Improved
Pinsent Masons 2.7 1.9 12.8 12.9 Improved
Environmental Defenders Office 3.7 3.7 5.3 5.3 Improved
Knowmore Legal Services 3.9 3.9 0.2 0.2 Declined
Turks 4.6 5.2 12 12 Improved
Arnold Bloch Leibler 4.8 5.3 8.9 9.3 Improved
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited 5.4 5.2 8.5 8.2 Improved
Dentons 5.8 6.7 9.7 9.8 Improved
Maddocks 5.9 5.9 5.4 5.2 Declined
Hicksons 7.6 8.4 14.1 15.9 Improved
Gilbert + Tobin 8.1 7.1 8.5 7.5 Improved
Gilchrist Connell 8.3 10.6 10 10.5 Improved
Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia Limited 8.4 9.1 16.7 16.9 Improved
Hall & Wilcox 8.6 8.9 10.6 10.6 Improved
Lander & Rogers 8.7 8.8 22.9 24.3 Improved
Ashurst 9.3 8.6 9.6 9.3 Improved
Sparke Helmore 9.6 8.5 10.5 9.9 Improved
Gadens 10.1 9.5 20.9 18.6 Improved
Norton Rose Fulbright 10.3 10 6.3 6.3 Declined
Russell Kennedy 10.4 11 11.9 11.9 Improved
Piper Alderman 9.1 8.8 11 9.4 Improved
Law Society of NSW 11.3 13.2 6 7 Declined
Holding Redlich 11.6 12 9.5 10.1 Declined
McCullough Robertson 11.7 13 28.7 30.2 Improved
Turner Freeman Lawyers 12 12.1 N/A N/A N/A
Colin Biggers & Paisley 12.2 12 11.6 10.3 Declined
Allens 12.3 11.1 11.3 10.8 Declined
The Lantern Legal Group 12.5 12.5 18.1 18.4 Improved
MinterEllison 12.6 12.6 13.1 12.8 Improved
A&O Shearman 12.7 8.9 12.9 10.5 Improved
Allen Overy Shearman Sterling 12.7 8.9 N/A N/A N/A
HFW 12.9 13.5 8.3 8.8 Declined
King & Wood Mallesons 12.9 12.5 9.5 10.3 Declined
HWL Ebsworth 13 13.2 14.7 14.9 Improved
Queensland Law Society 13.1 13.1 16 16.3 Improved
Clayton Utz 13.2 12.3 14.2 12.4 Improved
LegalVision 13.3 3.8 N/A N/A N/A
College of Law 13.4 11.6 11.6 10.3 Declined
Makinson D'Apice 13.6 13.6 18.5 18.5 Improved
Hamilton Locke 12 7.1 13.7 8.1 Improved
Baker McKenzie 13.9 13.4 12.4 12.6 Improved
Clifford Chance 14.1 12.3 14 15.1 Improved
Herbert Smith Freehills 14.2 13.9 17.1 17.3 Improved
Barry Nilsson 14.3 14.6 15.4 15.3 Improved
Carter Newell 14.3 12.9 17.1 15.4 Improved
Corrs Chambers Westgarth 14.9 14.8 17.8 18.1 Improved
Mills Oakley 15.1 14 10.6 9.1 Declined
Addisons 15.4 15.2 11.2 11.6 Declined
Ligeti Services 17.1 16.9 22.8 24 Improved
Thomson Geer 18.3 15.9 17.5 15.5 Declined
Avant Law 18.4 16.2 17.6 15.3 Declined
Johnson Winter Slattery 18.4 19 15.1 16.4 Declined
Dye & Durham 19.2 16.7 19.5 19.5 Improved
Moray & Agnew 19.3 19.4 17.7 18.3 Declined
White & Case 19.3 20.1 20.9 20.2 Improved
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporation Family Violence Prevention and Legal Service (Victoria) 19.4 19.5 N/A N/A N/A
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (QLD) 19.9 20.3 23.8 24 Improved
KHQ Lawyers 20.1 20.1 N/A N/A N/A
Cowell Clarke 21 21.2 17.3 17.3 Declined
K&L Gates 22.1 22.6 16.9 17.1 Declined
Maurice Blackburn 23.4 23.7 20.5 20.5 Declined
Bartier Perry 24 24.4 29.5 29.9 Improved
Slater & Gordon 24 21.9 23.9 22.6 Declined
Thomson Reuters 24.4 17.5 18.9 16.5 Declined
DLA Piper 24.8 25.9 15.4 16 Declined
Arnold Thomas & Becker 25 21.9 36.8 29.2 Improved
Wotton + Kearney 25.4 24.1 22.7 22.6 Declined
Clyde & Co 26.3 20.6 14 11.3 Declined
Jackson McDonald 26.6 26.3 24.4 25 Declined
McCabes 26.6 26.3 32.8 33.4 Improved
Shine Justice 26.6 24.9 28.1 27.7 Improved
AF Legal 27.5 27.2 N/A N/A N/A
HopgoodGanim Lawyers 28.5 30.2 28.1 29.4 Declined
Eventus Lawyers 30.7 31.4 26.6 27.8 Declined
Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers 31.2 29.3 37.7 35.8 Improved
McInnes Wilson 33.1 32.8 39.7 39.3 Improved
Galilee Solicitors 36.8 36.8 32.1 32.1 Declined
Macpherson Kelley 37.2 34.1 42.4 36.8 Improved
Griffith Hack 38 33.4 30.1 30 Declined
Fragomen (Australia) 39.6 31.5 37.5 32.7 Declined
Cornwalls 40.9 43.7 43.9 46.4 Improved
FPA Patent Attorneys 42.9 39.9 N/A N/A N/A
Meridian Lawyers 44.5 44.5 45.5 46 Improved
Jones Day 45.2 46.6 49.6 51.2 Improved
Coleman Greig 45.4 46.8 48.4 49.4 Improved
Davies Collison Cave 52.8 49.2 45.6 45.6 Declined
Spruson & Ferguson 56.8 49.2 52 49.9 Declined

Below are the results of the median total remuneration and median base salary gender pay gaps for the last three reporting periods.

2024–25 2023–24 2022–23
FIRM Median total remuneration gap (%) Median base salary gap (%) Median total remuneration gap (%) Median base salary gap (%) Median total remuneration gap (%) Median base salary gap (%)
Kennedys (Australasia) Partnership 9.7 9.7 -7.3 -6.6 N/A N/A
Lavan 1.5 2.6 33.4 28 42.4 42.3
Marsdens Law Group -7.5 -8.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Lawyers on Demand 1.8 0 -3 -5.3 21.2 20.2
Pinsent Masons -0.3 -0.3 -3.2 -2 -5.1 -3.6
Environmental Defenders Office 1 1 0 0 N/A N/A
Knowmore Legal Services 2.1 2.1 0 0 N/A N/A
Turks -2.4 -1.8 9.4 9.4 34.9 34.9
Arnold Bloch Leibler 4.5 4.5 4.5 8 8.7 8
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited 8.5 10.1 15 9.9 9.8 9.9
Dentons 0 0 4.1 4.5 7.1 7.1
Maddocks 1.5 1.5 7.9 7.9 8 8.9
Hicksons 5.7 3.3 10.5 5 2 0
Gilbert + Tobin 12.9 10.5 13.5 11.4 9.2 7.9
Gilchrist Connell 5.4 7.7 4.7 5.8 7.2 7.9
Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia Limited 3.1 3.4 8 N/A N/A N/A
Hall & Wilcox 3.1 3.1 11.5 9.5 7.2 7.9
Lander & Rogers 7.1 7.1 21.2 21.3 25 25
Ashurst 16.6 15.5 13.9 15.2 13.6 12
Sparke Helmore 16.3 15 13.2 8.6 11.8 11.8
Norton Rose Fulbright 14.9 14.4 11.2 11 12.8 11.7
Russell Kennedy 12.2 8.8 7.9 8.4 24.8 21.8
Piper Alderman 16.4 15.5 13.1 11.1 16.4 16.4
Law Society of NSW 15.4 15.2 8.8 12.5 13.9 24.2
Holding Redlich 5.5 5.5 9.5 9.5 2.1 2.1
McCullough Robertson 20.4 20.4 19.3 18.5 12.7 11.3
Turner Freeman Lawyers 1 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Colin Biggers & Paisley 14.1 7.4 23.5 22.6 N/A N/A
Allens 13.2 12.7 10.4 9.4 9.8 9.4
The Lantern Legal Group 11.3 11.3 12.2 12.2 N/A N/A
MinterEllison 14.8 16 17.6 17 18.6 18.1
A&O Shearman 15.2 8.8 5.6 6.2 N/A N/A
Allen Overy Shearman Sterling 15.2 8.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
HFW 27.5 25.1 20.4 20.3 14.5 9.7
King & Wood Mallesons 14.2 12.5 14.6 13.4 12.3 11.8
HWL Ebsworth 18.2 18.2 18 18 11.1 11.1
Queensland Law Society 8.4 8.4 16.2 16.2 8 8
Clayton Utz 11.2 11.1 11.9 10.1 N/A N/A
LegalVision -4.3 -5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
College of Law 21.5 20.3 0.6 1.9 12.3 9.7
Makinson D'Apice 16.6 16.6 24.4 24.4 N/A N/A
Hamilton Locke 12.4 13.1 14.7 13.1 N/A N/A
Baker McKenzie 16.1 11 15.4 14.7 17.5 12.7
Clifford Chance 28.6 13.1 8.1 3.1 25.7 12.9
Herbert Smith Freehills 12 10.7 16.2 13.7 15.6 17.3
Barry Nilsson 21.8 21.8 21.2 22.9 21.6 21.2
Carter Newell -2.7 -2.7 -2.4 -2.4 -6.4 -6.4
Corrs Chambers Westgarth 13.2 15.7 16 17.7 19 22.2
Gadens 13.2 11.9 11.2 13 5.3 7
Mills Oakley 8.7 10.4 9.1 6.1 15.3 11.6
Addisons 29.3 27.1 18.3 18.7 N/A N/A
Ligeti Services -4.2 -4.2 9.8 9.8 N/A N/A
Thomson Geer 6.3 5.9 16.7 14.3 17.1 16.1
Avant Law 15.3 17.8 15.7 12.8 21.6 20.2
Johnson Winter Slattery 17.4 18.4 8.1 8.1 12.1 11.9
Dye & Durham 23.3 23.3 7 7 N/A N/A
Moray & Agnew 16.9 16.5 13.3 14.4 7.9 8.2
White & Case 30.6 28.6 31 33.3 N/A N/A
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporation Family Violence Prevention and Legal Service (Victoria) 24.2 24.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (QLD) 20.5 25.1 22.2 21.7 19.9 21.7
KHQ Lawyers 27.6 27.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cowell Clarke 16.7 16.7 8.5 8.5 N/A N/A
K&L Gates 18.5 18.5 19.5 19.5 15.3 15.3
Maurice Blackburn 33.9 34.6 31.4 33.2 30.7 31.7
Bartier Perry 37.9 37.9 42.9 42.6 50 42.9
Slater & Gordon 35.7 34 31.7 32.4 31.3 33
Thomson Reuters 21.8 16.6 25 24 28.5 25.5
DLA Piper 15.4 15.4 15.2 15.2 17 15.3
Arnold Thomas & Becker 16.2 14.3 37 35.5 N/A N/A
Wotton + Kearney 24.2 27.3 25 28.1 29.4 30
Clyde & Co 20.1 17.2 17.8 15.8 22.9 18.6
Jackson McDonald 28.8 31.4 24.5 24.5 N/A N/A
McCabes 7.8 7.8 23.4 23.1 26.6 36.6
Shine Justice 28.5 27.9 34.2 35 24.9 25.5
AF Legal 36.3 36.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
HopgoodGanim Lawyers 25.4 25.4 31.3 31 29.4 30.8
Eventus Lawyers 41.8 40.7 22.1 23.8 N/A N/A
Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers 17.5 18.2 32.7 32.9 N/A N/A
McInnes Wilson 35.4 34.3 29.9 29.5 28.3 24
Galilee Solicitors 27.7 27.7 18.5 18.5 N/A N/A
Macpherson Kelley 35.6 35.7 40.9 37.5 41 39.7
Griffith Hack 40.7 36.9 35 33.6 45.2 42.3
Fragomen (Australia) 12.1 12.1 15.8 16 15.6 13.8
Cornwalls 34.7 34.7 49.1 49.1 30.4 23.6
FPA Patent Attorneys 37.6 33.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meridian Lawyers 39.2 39.2 48.6 47 32 31
Jones Day 37.9 37.9 44.6 44.6 38.5 38.5
Coleman Greig 53.8 53.7 45.1 43.5 47.9 48
Davies Collison Cave 50 50 40.2 40.2 N/A N/A
Spruson & Ferguson 64.8 55.9 61.7 58.3 26.6 37.6

Below are the figures for the number of women at each of the firms, including a look at the upper quartile and lowest quartile of the workplace.

2024–25 2023–24
FIRM Total workforce women (%) Upper quartile women (%) Lower quartile women (%) Total workforce women (%) Upper quartile women (%) Lower quartile women (%)
Kennedys (Australasia) Partnership 59 70 56 62 62 56
Lavan 72 74 68 74 55 91
Marsdens Law Group 86 93 82 N/A N/A N/A
Lawyers on Demand 59 52 59 65 68 58
Pinsent Masons 69 62 68 70 61 71
Environmental Defenders Office 82 79 83 82 81 81
Knowmore Legal Services 83 85 85 78 76 80
Turks 73 66 77 73 61 78
Arnold Bloch Leibler 64 63 64 64 65 73
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited 68 57 81 73 58 79
Dentons 65 63 74 63 60 72
Maddocks 70 65 69 63 63 57
Hicksons 73 69 70 72 65 67
Gilbert + Tobin 63 57 70 63 56 72
Gilchrist Connell 92 92 88 78 68 78
Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia Limited 73 71 85 71 57 76
Hall & Wilcox 74 71 72 74 72 73
Lander & Rogers 74 71 79 72 59 82
Ashurst 65 59 71 60 61 64
Sparke Helmore 74 69 75 74 66 78
Norton Rose Fulbright 68 65 79 66 64 74
Russell Kennedy 78 72 70 65 63 60
Piper Alderman 67 60 80 62 63 70
Law Society of NSW 67 70 72 63 69 67
Holding Redlich 78 75 80 77 74 79
McCullough Robertson 72 64 79 71 56 77
Turner Freeman Lawyers 83 76 73 N/A N/A N/A
Colin Biggers & Paisley 71 57 71 70 61 72
Allens 68 60 77 67 63 75
The Lantern Legal Group 70 57 62 N/A N/A N/A
MinterEllison 70 62 79 70 62 79
A&O Shearman 68 64 69 67 60 69
Allen Overy Shearman Sterling 68 64 69 N/A N/A N/A
HFW 62 57 74 62 61 79
King & Wood Mallesons 66 60 74 66 60 73
HWL Ebsworth 69 61 75 69 59 70
Queensland Law Society 71 62 74 72 60 69
Clayton Utz 65 56 70 65 56 69
LegalVision 63 60 67 N/A N/A N/A
College of Law 67 63 71 66 57 76
Makinson D'Apice 76 72 78 77 68 80
Hamilton Locke 55 48 65 55 51 67
Baker McKenzie 65 60 72 58 60 60
Clifford Chance 71 57 71 48 37 68
Herbert Smith Freehills 65 57 67 65 56 79
Barry Nilsson 73 68 76 75 67 72
Carter Newell 71 65 75 74 69 76
Corrs Chambers Westgarth 64 56 70 66 59 72
Gadens 68 60 71 63 63 66
Mills Oakley 72 64 75 72 65 68
Addisons 71 57 71 73 63 80
Ligeti Services 59 56 56 67 61 73
Thomson Geer 67 57 80 67 53 69
Avant Law 77 60 81 74 53 74
Johnson Winter Slattery 69 60 74 69 65 72
Dye & Durham 47 32 68 51 30 65
Moray & Agnew 73 59 75 73 60 75
White & Case 66 49 68 65 51 72
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporation Family Violence Prevention and Legal Service (Victoria) 96 88 100 N/A N/A N/A
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (QLD) 62 40 81 61 32 80
KHQ Lawyers 70 61 78 N/A N/A N/A
Cowell Clarke 71 57 72 70 59 62
K&L Gates 63 50 72 65 54 72
Maurice Blackburn 77 61 82 77 64 82
Bartier Perry 71 57 71 66 35 69
Slater & Gordon 76 60 85 76 61 83
Thomson Reuters 57 40 68 56 42 67
DLA Piper 64 54 76 67 58 79
Arnold Thomas & Becker 80 67 88 81 57 89
Wotton + Kearney 68 52 75 64 48 75
Clyde & Co 70 60 73 69 57 78
Jackson McDonald 70 57 82 N/A N/A N/A
McCabes 66 53 72 66 48 75
Shine Justice 76 61 80 75 59 81
AF Legal 78 61 85 N/A N/A N/A
HopgoodGanim Lawyers 65 46 66 65 47 73
Eventus Lawyers 74 48 79 67 46 79
Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers 70 47 66 N/A N/A N/A
McInnes Wilson 66 43 73 66 38 75
Galilee Solicitors 63 30 74 65 38 71
Macpherson Kelley 63 39 74 54 36 64
Griffith Hack 71 44 89 68 44 79
Fragomen (Australia) 75 64 85 74 62 86
Cornwalls 60 29 71 59 21 86
FPA Patent Attorneys 70 50 90 N/A N/A N/A
Meridian Lawyers 71 50 84 70 51 81
Jones Day 67 37 86 66 41 94
Coleman Greig 68 30 75 68 43 69
Davies Collison Cave 73 42 88 72 44 79
Spruson & Ferguson 69 26 89 68 21 91
Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Lawyers Weekly a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Lawyers Weekly as a preferred news source.

Naomi Neilson
Naomi Neilson is a senior journalist with a focus on court reporting for Lawyers Weekly, as well as other titles under the Momentum Media umbrella. She regularly writes about matters before the Federal Court of Australia, the Supreme Courts, the Civil and Administrative Tribunals, and the Fair Work Commission. Naomi has also published investigative pieces about the legal profession, including sexual harassment and bullying, wage disputes, and staff exoduses. You can email Naomi at: naomi.neilson@momentummedia.com.au.