find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Piper Alderman weighs up Lehman class action

Piper Alderman weighs up Lehman class action

The class action hearing brought by 72 councils, charities and churches against global investment bank Lehman Brothers Australia came to an end last week.

THE class action hearing brought by 72 councils, charities and churches against global investment bank Lehman Brothers Australia came to an end in the Federal Court last week.

The Councils, led by Wingecarribee Shire Council, seek $248 million in compensation from Lehman Australia for claims including breach of contract and fiduciary duty, misleading conduct and negligence.

National law firm Piper Alderman, led by partner Amanda Banton, represents the applicants.

The applicants presented a full account of the advisory investment relationship existing between the councils and Lehman Brothers Australia, formerly Grange Securities. Lehman purchased the investment firm in March 2007.

Evidence brought on behalf of the applicants included testimonies from several council employees along with extensive documents relating to the way collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and other synthetic structured products were sold.

After the applicant’s evidence on the methods by which the CDOs were recommended, marketed and sold Lehman decided not to call any lay witnesses in its defence to counter the evidence of the councils regarding the conduct of Lehmans and the representations made, Piper Alderman said in a statement.

Piper Alderman’s success in gaining access to Lehman documents revealing details of an internal investigation into the conduct of sales staff as they marketed financial products including CDOs was important to the applicant’s case, the firm said. Lehman argued that these emails were privileged and confidential.

Justice Yates of the Federal Court of Australia found that professional privilege had not attached to the documents and ordered their production.

An expert for the applicant’s case provided the Court with an interpretation of one of these crucial emails, which read “Below are some switch ideas based on our axes both on and off the book. As we control the CDO market we should be able to execute any of these without issue.”

The expert told the Court that “axes” are a trader’s priorities and that “a switch idea” based on Lehman’s axes, would be based on their desire to add or to shed risk.

Another marketing tool used at the point of sale, as alleged by the councils, was to explain that the products could be bought and sold at any time.

“It was particularly important to many of my clients that they could sell at any time and without penalty as they had uncertain liquidity requirements,” said Banton.

An expert conceded that the products were “buy and hold to maturity” products. The applicants allege that at the time they were investing in these CDOs, it was represented by Lehman that there was an active secondary market for these products.

A liquidity expert called by Lehman said that this was not the case. “I don’t believe that [the trades] are representative of any kind of normal market activity or normal arms-length activity between a customer and a broker or a customer and a fiduciary.”

The trial is now to be adjourned for one month, resuming on 30 May 2011 for one week.

Piper Alderman’s Banton said: “We are very pleased with the outcome of the case to date.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017


Piper Alderman weighs up Lehman class action
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...