find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
NZ telco regime an Aussie affair

NZ telco regime an Aussie affair

AUSTRALIAN LEGAL practitioners are crossing the Tasman to assist New Zealand telecommunications carriers establish the country’s mobile network roll out legislative regime.Sydney-based…

AUSTRALIAN LEGAL practitioners are crossing the Tasman to assist New Zealand telecommunications carriers establish the country’s mobile network roll out legislative regime.

Sydney-based communications and technology firm Truman Hoyle is acting on behalf of NZ Communications Ltd in the regulatory process and other matters involved in rolling out the country’s third mobile network.

It’s a move that reflects similar work internationally, with firms like Truman Hoyle and Gilbert + Tobin being retained to utilise their Australian gained experience, in telecommunications regimes across the globe.

For Truman Hoyle, the bulk of their involvement comes from determining the mobile collocation terms. Dr Ross Patterson, NZ telecommunications commissioner said mobile collocation has been an obligation since the beginning of the Telecommunications Act in Australia, it’s these many years of experience that make Australian expertise appealing.

It’s an opportunity, said Patterson, for New Zealand to come up with a world-class regime. “This is going to be the world leadership position because it is new and no jurisdiction has yet really made it work,” he said. “We have the advantage of learning what’s been done and coming up with a model that will benefit consumers in a way we haven’t seen in other jurisdictions.

Even Dr Patterson himself has crossed the Tasman to his position as telecommunications commissioner after working 10 years for Minter Ellison in Australia.

Shane Barber, managing director of Truman Hoyle, said much of his involvement is around creating the terms for the New Zealand mobile market to branch out from its current state of duopoly. “NZ consumers don’t have choice,” he said. “They’re paying significantly more than people in other OECD countries are paying simply because there’s no competition.”

Barber believes the market is relatively immature, a problem realised as NZ moves to regulate the sector on issues that have been done elsewhere in the globe a long time ago. “The upside of course is that they can now adopt the best practices from around the world and have a world-leading regime,” he said. “The downside is that there’s an extra decade of incumbents. It means it’s hard without significant regulatory change.”

The added years of maturity in the Australian market give local legal practitioners particularly luring attributes relevant to overseas markets. “This kind of expertise is becoming a real export opportunity for Australian law firms that have the expertise and regulatory work, and it’s not as susceptible to the highs and lows in the commercial market,” said Barber.

The process is tipped to continue throughout 2008 with all carriers required to initially undertake a month long intensive negotiation under the auspices of the Telecommunications Carriers Forum in order to agree on network collocation terms. Vodafone New Zealand, under the direction of the New Zealand Commerce Commission, is then required to develop a standard terms proposal incorporating whatever agreement is achieved. From there, the Commerce Commission will call for a series of submissions and cross submissions before it establishes the Standard Terms Determination on mobile network co-location.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

NZ telco regime an Aussie affair
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...