find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Australia wins international moot

Australia wins international moot

Jessup moot

A team from the University of Sydney have been awarded first place in the Philip C Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition.

The moot, held in Washington DC each year, is a simulation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It brings together 550 teams from more than 80 countries to discuss international law issues.

Sarah Bradbury, who was named best advocate in the competition, described the win against a team from Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile as a “surreal experience”.

"We've been working so hard and for so long, and never imagined we would make it all the way to the finish line. We were thrilled to conclude our Jessup experience on such a high note,” she said.

“The Jessup moot attracts incredible students from the best universities around the world," said Alice Zhou, who was named best advocate in the final.

"This is a tremendous result for our talented students," said the dean of University of Sydney’s law school, Professor Joellen Riley.

The grand final was presided over by two judges from the ICJ, Sir Kenneth Keith and Judge Joan Donoghue, as well as international law professor and renowned advocate Professor Harold Koh.

The team of five (pictured) also won the Australian rounds of the competition in February. They travelled to the US with their opponents from the University of Western Australia, who also competed in the international round.

The moot problem this year involved the secession and annexation of a territory, inspired by the recent events in Crimea.

“It also concerned the termination of a bilateral mining treaty in the face of a dramatic change in the economic value of that mineral, highlighting the importance of natural resources to developing states,” Ms Zhou said.

The team spent months preparing for the competition, researching the relevant areas of law and engaging in practice moots from November last year.

“This was a fantastic experience, and allowed us to meet judges, barristers and solicitors who had an interest in international law, or who once themselves competed in the Jessup,” Ms Bradbury said.

Ms Zhou described travelling to the US as an exciting experience: “After working on the Jessup all summer, we were eager to meet all the other students who had worked on the same problem.”

Ms Bradbury said participating in the competition had helped open her eyes to the opportunities available in international law: “I am now realising this doesn't just have to be a hobby.”

Although the moot is an “extraordinary commitment” and is “intellectually extremely challenging”, Ms Bradbury said she would definitely recommend it to other students.

“The experience you receive in properly researching and writing a sophisticated legal argument, and working in a team with four bright individuals, is so rewarding. The Jessup moot also allows you to explore the world of oral advocacy, and to learn how to persuasively put forward an argument before even the most unrelenting of judges.”

The key lessons she took from competition include the importance of being concise and the ability to focus quickly on the key issues.

“We had to condense numerous complex legal and factual questions into 20-minute oral submissions and learned to set out the law as clearly and quickly as possible, then go right to the heart of the contention between the parties.”

Pictured from left to right: Professor Harold Koh, Joan Donoghue, Sir Kenneth Keith, Alice Zhou, Sarah Bradbury, Sam Murray, Angus Nicholas and Nathan Hauser.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Australia wins international moot
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...