find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
US judges’ most-referenced authors revealed

US judges’ most-referenced authors revealed

Shakespeare may have penned the famous line "let's kill all the lawyers" but he remains a favourite among US judges.

A study by University of California law professors Scott Dodson and Ami Dodson, recently published in The Economist, shows the most frequently cited authors by judges of the US Supreme Court.

Shakespeare tied for the most common allusion, alongside Alice in Wonderland author Lewis Carroll.

Both authors have been referenced 16 times each in Supreme court judgments by current members of the Supreme Court – coincidentally, by the same five justices.

The justices also found inspiration in dystopian fiction, with 1984 author George Orwell cited eight times and Brave New World author Aldous Huxley cited four times.

Charles Dickens proved popular with six citations, while Aesop, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, William Faulkner, Herman Melville and JD Salinger were referenced twice each.

However, the authors acknowledged the study’s limitations, with popular fiction, poetry and comics excluded from consideration.

Shakespeare’s popularity among legal professionals is not limited to the US Supreme Court.

In 2012, the High Court in Britain drew on King Lear to overturn a conviction related to a threat via Twitter – in the judgment, it is held social media users should have freedom to “speak what they feel, not what they ought to say".

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

US judges’ most-referenced authors revealed
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Quentin Bryce
Oct 18 2017
DV has worsened in a generation: Quentin Bryce
Former governor-general of Australia Dame Quentin Bryce AD CVO has spoken of her deep distress about...
Oct 18 2017
Academics entertain the idea of law without lawyers
Researchers from Queensland will explore some of the most disruptive trends tipped to transform the ...
Please, Continue (Hamlet), Melbourne Festival
Oct 16 2017
Hamlet suffers slings and arrows of top Victorian barristers
Victorian judges and barristers have performed the unique play Please, Continue (Hamlet) at the Melb...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...