find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Redlich v Redlic

Redlich v Redlic

Redlich v RedlichThe incestuousness of the law can sometimes throw up some provoking scenarios such as one last month in the Supreme Court of Victoria.High profile entertainment firm Holding…

Redlich v Redlich

The incestuousness of the law can sometimes throw up some provoking scenarios such as one last month in the Supreme Court of Victoria.

High profile entertainment firm Holding Redlich was hauled before the bench to argue a waiver of legal professional privilege case. And staring down at them from up high, waiting to pass judgement, was none other than Justice Robert Redlich.

So why didn’t anyone hear more about this? Surely some sort of mis- carriage of justice could be made out here?

Well, unfortunately this is one of those disappointing occasions where there is actually less to the situation than meets the eye. His Honour and namesake Peter Redlich, chairman of the mid-tier firm, are not — and never have been — related, genetically or professionally.

Death becomes them

An appropriately named party, Death, was named in the Supreme Court of NSW recently as the bench considered a case pertaining to wills and codicils.

Corrs for tears

Some might say former Corrs Chambers Westgarth partner James O’Callaghan was one of the unlucky ones …

Many would well remember that before he was unceremoniously struck from the roll a couple of years back, Brisbane-based O’Callaghan success-fully swindled $804,857.17 out of clients.

In fact, he padded his timesheets so much between 1994 and 2000 that at one stage pillow makers Tontine were said to be interested in sponsoring him.

Last week O’Callaghan was dealt anything but a soft landing in Brisbane’s District Court. He reportedly cried like a baby during sentencing and it’s unlikely that the seven-year jail term would have put a stop to the gush.

The court heard that the fraud was conducted to support day-to-day — as opposed to decade-to-decade — living expenses.

Corrs reimbursed the 16 victims long ago.

Continuing on with the mortality theme, we remain in the Supreme Court to take a look at a will, the executor of which obviously lays great claim to being the lifeblood of racial sensitivity.

And just to confirm what a tolerant society it is in which we live, the court did the right thing by determining the deceased’s responsible wishes were to be carried out to the letter.

We hope you can all learn a thing or two from Kay v South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service [2003] NSWSC 292 and in doing so make the world a better place.

“I appoint Stephen Kay ... to be Executor and Trustee of this my Will & I expect him to carry out my orders without any changes and no-one can contest it.

I give Royal North Shore Hospital $10,000 for the Liver Department ... I give The Children's Hospital at Randwick $10,000 for treatment of White (and white is underlined twice) babies. I give the Blind Dogs $10,000 for dog pets for the elderly.

I give the Pink Ladies at Ryde Hospital $5,000 & my finished craft to sell in their shop ... My brother, his wife or any of their descendants are not (not is underlined twice) to get anything out of the house or one cent of any money. If Stephen Kay wants to sell the house he must sell it to a young white (white is underlined twice) Australian couple for a reasonable price & not sell at auction or to a developer.

Nothing in the house is to be sold. It is to be given to anyone who needs it or to charity, even Rotary for their garage sale but not the Smith Family or St Vincent de Paul. What no-one wants is to go to the tip. So goodbye to anyone who is interested.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Redlich v Redlic
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...