Beauty in the eye of the lawyer
It's official: if you're a hot lawyer, your pay packet will be hot too - unless you graduated in the 1980s. In the midst of a recent debate about whether good looking lawyers earn more than
It's official: if you're a hot lawyer, your pay packet will be hot too - unless you graduated in the 1980s.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
In the midst of a recent debate about whether good looking lawyers earn more than their aesthetically challenged colleagues, the editorial team at Above the Law stumbled across a gem of a report completed in 1998 by the National Bureau of Economic Research, titled Beauty, Productivity and Discrimination: Lawyers' Looks and Lucre.
The researchers, Jeff Biddle and Daniel Hamermesh, came to these highly useful statistical conclusions:
* Lawyers in the private sector are better looking than those in the public sector;
* Litigators are the best looking lawyers and regulators the worst;
* Super spunky men have more chances of early partnership;
* Super spunky women, on the other hand, are less likely to become partners;
* Easy-on-the-eye lawyers charge more and thus make more money.
These results are based on graduates from the 70s and 80s, with good-looking lawyers who graduated in the 70s obtaining a definite economic advantage over the 15 years that followed graduation.
Interestingly though, those who graduated in the 80s could not, after a period of time, be differentiated on matters of attractability or otherwise.
Folklaw speculates that the reasons for this are quite simple: no-one looks good sporting a permed mullet while decked out in high-waisted, stone-wash denim or a pastel, ankle-swinging suit with shoulder pads.