find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Criminals take lawyers to court

Criminals take lawyers to court

The Supreme Court of the United States has heard arguments from two convicted criminals who say they ended up in far worse positions than they would have been because of dodgy advice from their…

The Supreme Court of the United States has heard arguments from two convicted criminals who say they ended up in far worse positions than they would have been because of dodgy advice from their lawyers.

The New York Times reports that the cases, heard last week, involved defendants who had failed to accept what turned out to be rather attractive plea bargains - all because of their lawyers.

The first case involved a certain Mr Frye who was charged with driving without a license in 2007. A prosecutor initially offered to let him plead guilty in exchange for a 90-day sentence.

Frye's lawyer, however, failed to tell his client about the offer and, after it expired, Frye pleaded guilty, the prosecutor went to town, and Frye was sentenced to three years in prison.

An appeals court reversed the conviction but said it was "powerless" to ask prosecutors to revive the old plea bargain. Instead, the court said Frye could either plead guilty again or have the matter go to trial.

For Frye, that was not a terribly good option, as was pointed out by the Supreme Court's Justice Alito Jr, a former prosecutor, who said that proving a defendant was driving with a revoked license was a "slam-dunk trial".

The second case considered was that of Anthony Cooper, whose lawyer told him not to plead guilty to assault with intent to murder - despite the fact he shot a woman four times.

His overly-confident lawyer, Brian McClain, said conviction was "impossible" because the bullets had struck the woman below her waist (McClain has obviously watched one too many episodes of CSI).

He persuaded Cooper to turn down an offer of four to seven years in the slammer. Unfortunately, Cooper took the advice and will now be staring at the ceiling of his prison cell for the next 15 to 30 years.

In both cases, the Supreme Court's Justice Breyer said there may be some circumstances in which concerns about fairness required courts to order that earlier and more favourable plea offers be reinstituted.

In Cooper's case, he wondered what should happen if a defendant copped a 50-year sentence after initially rejecting a two-year plea deal, especially where "the misbehavior of the lawyer is crystal clear".

In Frye's case, Breyer wondered about depriving "a person of his liberty for 40 years instead of six months because the lawyer ... fell down on the basic, fundamental, obvious duty of communicating the relevant plea agreement".

However, Justice Scalia concluded that trying to solve either problem would leave the courts "in the soup", because Cooper had, after all, received a fair trial, and Frye had entered a perfectly valid guilty plea.

And, as Justice Kennedy pointed out, challenging this would just not be cricket.

"You are saying it was unfair to have a fair trial?" he asked Cooper's lawyer.

Touché.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Criminals take lawyers to court
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jetski
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Consultation
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
IBA
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...