find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Supreme Court asked to rule on Janet Jackson’s nip slip

Supreme Court asked to rule on Janet Jackson’s nip slip

Folklaw loves an uplifting news story and is pleased to be able to get this particular one off its chest.

Folklaw loves an uplifting news story and is pleased to be able to get this particular one off its chest.

It involves the seemingly never-ending saga involving pop singer Janet Jackson’s infamous ‘wardrobe malfunction’ at the 2004 Super Bowl, which is again coming under scrutiny.

Bet you probably thought you could go the rest of your life without reading about Jackson’s nip slip again, right? Well think again.

In the US the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has requested that the Supreme Court review its previous decision to throw out the regulatory agency's $550,000 fine against CBS for airing a split-second shot of Jackson’s breast during her half-time performance with Justin Timberlake.

If you remember, CBS’s broadcast cut away quickly, but not before the incident was watched by millions of stunned viewers across the globe. Jackson and Timberlake maintain the incident was an accident caused by a “wardrobe malfunction”.

The FCC and the Justice Department have petitioned an appeal to a 2011 ruling, stating that the incident was "shocking and pandering".

In its petition to the court, Solicitor-General Donald Verrilli contends that the commission’s $550,000 fine for the incident was warranted because the indecency rules cover fleeting nudity.

Verrilli added that while the commission’s indecency rules at the time made an exception for “fleeting expletives”, that doesn’t mean a brief flash of nudity falls under that exception.

Earlier this year the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals denied a full-court rehearing of the 2011 decision, by a three-judge panel, that the FCC's fine of CBS stations was arbitrary.

It had originally overturned the fine in 2008, but the higher Supreme Court struck out the judgment, referring the case back to them in 2009.

This story looks set to rumble on for some time to come, but worry not Folklaw fans, we will endeavour to keep all our loyal readers abreast of any future developments.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Supreme Court asked to rule on Janet Jackson’s nip slip
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice, ALA, right-to-die law
Oct 24 2017
‘Right-to-die’ laws would be a relief for terminally ill: ALA
The passage of an assisted dying bill through the lower house of Victorian Parliament has been haile...
Diversity
Oct 24 2017
Diversity top of agenda for future WA Law Society president
The advancement of diversity in the Western Australian legal profession will be one of the key items...
Jetski
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...