find the latest legal job
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Embattled regulatory systems bill passed

Embattled regulatory systems bill passed

PARLIAMENT LAST week passed legislation touted as being the answer to regulatory complexity and the means to reduce regulatory burdens for companies. The Corporations Legislation Amendment…

PARLIAMENT LAST week passed legislation touted as being the answer to regulatory complexity and the means to reduce regulatory burdens for companies.

The Corporations Legislation Amendment (Simpler Regulatory System) Bill 2007 was welcomed by Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, Chris Pearce, who said that Australia’s corporate and financial services regulatory framework will be simpler and more efficient.

“This will enable many of the benefits that will flow from a reduction in the regulatory burden to be available from 1 July 2007, in particular the improve facility for distribution of the 2006—07 annual reports over the internet and electronic registration of charges,” Pearce said.

But the passing of the Bill was not without its tribulations. While it planned to support the passage of the government’s latest corporations reform Bill last week, Labor openly rejected the “rushed, ad hoc nature” of the amendments.

Before it was passed, the government and Federal Opposition entered into a parliamentary stoush over whether the Bill has appropriately addressed industry concerns and achieved what it set out to do.

According to Labor MP Anna Burke, while the package of amendments’ primary aim was to simplify and facilitate access to affordable financial advice for consumers, the Bill does not properly achieve this. She said that the “piecemeal approach to it is causing greater confusion for consumers and their advisers”.

While she acknowledged that the general measures of the Bill represent some progress towards simplification of some elements of “our complex financial regulatory system”, she said it was far from a comprehensive set of solutions.

“It is disturbing that after three years of financial services reform, FSR [Financial Services Reform] disclosure documentation is still lengthy, complex and unreadable, often of some 50—100 pages. The purpose of FSR was to give people documentation they could understand … With 50—100 pages most people give up in frustration and take the first set of advice, which is not always the best advice they could be getting,” Burke said.

But Burke said she recommends Labor support the passage of the Bill, even though “there is a lot of work still to be done”. She added that “it should have been done in a more timely and professional manner”.

The government rejected Burke’s claims, and Senator Grant Chapman said in the Senate last week that he was “somewhat bewildered and bemused” by the minority report by opposition members of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services to the report being tabled.

He said that on one hand the opposition members agree with the recommendations of the committee, and on the other hand they complain about it.

“Had Labor had any convictions of sound and strong policy making, the opposition members of the committee would have come up with strategies to address their concerns,” Chapman said.

“Agreeing to a recommendation because you have not got alternative policies and then whingeing about it reflects a basic lack of policies and strategies,” he said.

He claimed that the legislation was neither rushed nor ad hoc, and said the Bill reflects the government’s response to a number of recommendations of the Rethinking Regulation report of the Banks Regulation Taskforce of January 2006.

Freehills partner Bob Baxt told Lawyers Weekly that while there may be some validity to Labor’s claims that more consultation would have been beneficial, he said at least Pearce and his team are now starting to try and do things in a more effective manner.

Baxt acknowledged that there is a tension for governments in making sure there is adequate regulation to deal with company failures, but not overdoing the regulation.

“I think that this Bill is the first step in trying to simplify a regulatory environment and making it more manageable and certainly more relevant in the context of what needs to be done in the Australian environment,” he said.

While Labor had claimed the legislation was rushed, Baxt said that this was to be expected. “There is some truth in the fact that it is fairly rushed, but it certainly more leisurely than it used to be. Legislation used to go through Parliament much more quickly than this.

He added that the regulatory framework has a long way to go. “But this is the first step, and if you look at it from that point of view I think Labor’s criticism is a bit naïve. If you see this as the only thing they are going to do then I think you could say ‘well yes, absolutely you need more time’,” he said.

According to Baxt, the Bill is an important step in trying to undo a number of years of over regulation that was a result of “knee-jerk reactions” by government. He added that “the knee-jerk reactions by the Liberal-National Party Government is no different from what we saw in the Labor government in the past”.

For Baxt, the latest raft of legislation is a step in the right direction, towards a simpler regulatory regime.

“I think part of the problem in this country is that we have had so many ad hoc changes to our corporate law, it’s such a mess now, is that the only way to fix it up is to scrap it all and start again. But that won’t happen — it won’t happen, it can’t happen. But being pragmatic, what we need to do is get certain areas of our corporate law and make it more manageable,” he said.

Pearce said stakeholders had included the Australian Bankers’ Association, the Insurance Council of Australia, the Investment and Financial Services Association and the Business Council of Australia, all of which welcomed the reforms when they were introduced into Parliament last month.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Embattled regulatory systems bill passed
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Anti-radicalisation programs playing ‘second fiddle’ to terrorism laws
Several academics have questioned the balance between Australia’s counterterrorism legislation and...
 William Ah Ket
‘Bamboo ceiling’ thought piece wins inaugural law prize
A paper that explores the idea of affirmative action to achieve greater diversity among members of A...
Nov 22 2017
Reduced investment protections will make robust commercial arbitration mechanisms all the more critical for investors
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the current trend away from investor protect...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...