find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Lawyers to earn millions after Centro settles

Lawyers to earn millions after Centro settles

A substantial cut of the $200 million Centro class action settlement formally agreed to today (19 June) will go to lawyers.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly from Melbourne shortly after Federal Court Justice John Middleton agreed to the terms of the settlement, Maurice Blackburn lawyer Martin Hyde said that clients from his firm’s class action would receive more than half of the $150 million settlement garnered for his group’s members

“The vast majority of the money will go the clients, subject to a number of confirmations,” said Hyde. “I have had some really nice comments back from clients over the last few weeks after the settlement was announced.

“They obviously realise that if the action hadn’t been brought they wouldn’t have got back anything at all.”

The $200 million Centro settlement, a record settlement for class actions in Australia, was first announced in early May and agreed to by shareholders on 10 May.

Spoils of war

Two separate class actions were brought against Centro by Maurice Blackburn and Slater & Gordon.

In the settlement agreed to last month, Maurice Blackburn class action members were to receive $150 million and Slaters’ members $50 million.

Despite Maurice Blackburn’s members having only around 1000 members as compared to Slaters’ action having approximately 5000 retail investors, Maurice Blackburn’s members received the lion’s share of the funds due to the inclusion of significant institutional investors comprising large financial and superannuation companies that lost substantial amounts of money.

IMF Australia funded the Maurice Blackburn claim. In a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange in May, IMF said it would take a $60 million cut (40%) of that claim.

Hyde would not divulge what Maurice Blackburn’s fees would come to for acting on the matter, but it would be estimated to be in the millions.

The law firms acting for Centro and PwC would also be expected to reap millions in fees for their length of involvement in the matter.

The catalyst for the class action was a 2007 financial report released by Centro that failed to disclose that the company had more than $3 billion in debts that were due to be paid within 12 months.

Centro’s former auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), signed off on that financial report. PwC were then included in the claim by burnt Centro shareholders and also faced a cross claim by Centro.

Once the debt was disclosed, Centro’s share price plunged by almost 80 per cent.

Centro Properties (CNP) later went bust and had only around $10 million left to meet the claims.

In early 2007 CNP and the Centro Retail Trust (CER) were financing the acquisition of an American shopping trust.

Centro will pay around two thirds of the settlement figure, with PwC paying out just over $65 million.

Hyde said that settlement was welcomed by class action members as, if litigation ran its course, members could have been waiting years for any decision.

“Justice Middleton identified the same sorts of things we took into account when deciding to accept the in-principle settlement sum,” said Hyde, “which was it was inevitable the case would go to appeal, which meant uncertainty as to the result of the appeal and a delay until clients would potentially receive money.”

“We had three respondents, one of which became insolvent and was wound up last year, so recoverability was also a major factor.”

A cast of thousands

The Centro settlement was notable for the massive number of law firms and partners involved and the role of one lawyer who acted as a peacemaker to bring the feuding parties to a settlement.

In addition to Maurice Blackburn and Slater & Gordon, with the Slaters team being led by James Higgins, the listed law firm’s general manager of commercial litigation, Freehills acted for CNP and Middletons acted for CER. The lead Freehills partners were the Melbourne-based litigation specialists Damian Grave and Peter Holloway.

The Middletons team acting for CER was led by partners David Hope and Mark Dobbie.

Lander & Rogers partners Natalie Gullifer and Radhika Mendis acted for Centro Retail Australia Limited.

PwC was represented by King & Wood Mallesons. Sydney-based partners Moira Saville and Alexander Morris were heavily involved in the settlement negotiations.

Slaters’ class action was funded by Comprehensive Legal Funding.

A curious tale in the Centro saga and eventual settlement was the involvement of Melbourne-based Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Leon Zwier.

Zwier, a noted insolvency and dispute resolution practice specialist, had previously acted for hedge fund managers related to Centro and for PwC in other matters. He became involved in the settlement negotiations as a facilitator on a pro bono basis in April after being contacted by various parties.

“He got the parties together,” IMF Australia executive director John Walker told Lawyers Weekly in May.

No precedent

While Hyde welcomed the settlement, he said the fact the matter wasn’t decided in the courts meant that the issue of law in relation to causation and loss remain unsettled.

“One of the downsides of the settlement is that we still haven’t got a decision from an Australian court on precisely how you calculate loss and damage in these sorts of cases,” said Hyde. “This will remain an area of some uncertainty going forward.”

It is expected that the approximately 6000 class members from both groups should start to receive payments before the end of September.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers to earn millions after Centro settles
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...