find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
ASIC strikes ‘dirty deal’ in Storm case

ASIC strikes ‘dirty deal’ in Storm case

The 11th-hour settlement deal between ASIC and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) in the Storm Financial saga was “calculated to inflict damage”, according to the lawyer heading up a class action against the bank.

CBA struck a deal with ASIC at 4.22pm on Friday (14 September) – the business day before the resumption of court proceedings, which have now been postponed by a week. The settlement will offer Storm investors up to $136 million in compensation above what has already been paid. While it has been widely reported that investors lost about $3 billion when the financial services company folded in 2009, ASIC has claimed the figure is closer to $830 million.

The deal ends the court battle between ASIC and CBA, but the bank is still fighting a class action launched by Levitt Robinson, which is representing around 300 Storm investors. Stewart Levitt (pictured), principal solicitor at the firm, told Lawyers Weekly that his case has not been weakened by ASIC’s decision to settle.

He does concede, however, that the deal was “calculated to inflict damage”.

“It was a tactic to try and unnerve the people we represent ... [ASIC] gave us no notice of the position [and] appeared gung-ho about the matter up until the end of last week.”

Levitt accused the financial watchdog of engaging in “backroom dirty deals” with CBA and failing to include Storm investors in settlement negotiations.

Under the agreement, investors would recover about 55 per cent of their total loss “allocated to the CBA”, ASIC revealed in a statement. The “allocated” amount refers to money that was borrowed from the bank (which provided margin and home loans to Storm investors) to invest in Storm.

This deal is also available to around 1000 Slater & Gordon clients who accepted compensation under the CBA Resolution Scheme in 2010. The terms of the previous agreement included a “carve-out” clause entitling clients to participate in a settlement scheme between CBA and ASIC.

Ben Hardwick, practice group leader with Slater & Gordon’s commercial and project litigation group, told Lawyers Weekly that his clients can now “top up their compensation entitlement”. These investors will need to account for any cash compensation or loan reductions, but won’t be penalised for accepting interest rate waivers, reduced interest rates or flexible loan arrangements, he added.

“[Our clients] have been adequately compensated ... they haven’t had to pay any legal costs and they now have a second bite of the cherry,” Hardwick said.

He warned Storm investors who plan to decline ASIC’s offer and participate in an investor class action that if they lose in court they will miss out on compensation altogether.

“Their destiny will be in the hands of the court,” he said.

CBA has not admitted liability in relation to either settlement.

ASIC had accused CBA of acting unconscionably by selling an unregistered management investment scheme to Storm customers prior to its collapse. The regulator revealed it will continue its unregistered management investment scheme proceedings against Storm, Bank of Queensland and Macquarie.

These court proceedings will commence next Monday (24 September).

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ASIC strikes ‘dirty deal’ in Storm case
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...