find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Directors’ liability limited

Directors’ liability limited

New laws that significantly reduce the liability burden on company directors in NSW have been slammed by the NSW Greens but welcomed by the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

New laws that significantly reduce the liability burden on company directors in NSW have been slammed by the NSW Greens but welcomed by the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD).

The laws, passed on Tuesday night (20 November), reduce the number of offences that special directors' liability provisions apply from more than 1000 to around 150.

Previously, directors were subject to a reverse onus of proof that deemed them personally liable for failing to prevent their companies from committing an offence unless they could prove their innocence.

Steve Burrell, AICD’s general manager (communications and public affairs), said the Miscellaneous Acts Amendment (Directors’ Liability) Act 2012 was an important step towards reform.

“Directors shouldn’t be treated as a different class of citizen who somehow have a different rule of law applied to them,” said Burrell.

So-called type-three liability for directors, which places the legal burden of proof on directors, has been substantially reversed and replaced by type-one liability, in which the prosecution has the onus to prove a breach.

“It fits the essence of the [reform] model that we put forward, which essentially said that knowingly authorising or recklessly permitting an act to occur is the only situation where a director would be liable and that would apply in a relatively limited number of cases,” said Burrell.

Greens MP John Kaye said the changes are a gift to corporate boardrooms that will create a culture of directors turning a blind eye.

 "A century of strengthening the responsibility of directors has been reversed,” Kaye said in a statement.

The legislation, he said, will inevitably lead to a lower level of company compliance with crucial laws – around child safety, the environment, tax obligations and hazardous materials - that protect the public and the environment.

“The O'Farrell Government is creating dangerously perverse incentives for boardrooms to take their chances when something goes wrong," said Kaye.

But Burrell said the AICD isn’t arguing that directors should have no liability. He told Lawyers Weekly that in instances of child safety and public health it’s appropriate for liability to fall on directors, as long as it’s proportionate and appropriately targeted.

“What’s happened in the past is liability has been applied willy-nilly across a whole range of legislation, including some as obscure as the Beekeepers Act.

“The liability pendulum has swung too far and this brings it back to a much more principled and appropriate place,” he said.

According to the results of the AICD’s November Director Sentiment Index, more than 40 per cent of directors believe that Commonwealth or state legislation on director liability has a negative impact on their business decision making and willingness to continue on a board.

More than half said it has a negative impact on their willingness to accept new board appointments, according to the twice-yearly survey of more than 500 Australian chairmen and directors.

The AICD was closely involved in discussions that led to the principles agreed at COAG on director liability laws. This involvement is starting to bear fruit and NSW is leading the way, said Burrell.

“The Victorians have some provisions out for consultation at the moment and they are very much moving in the right direction … Queensland  has decided it wants to go in the same way but we haven’t seen much detail from them yet … Tasmania  has also got some legislation before its parliament at the moment, which we’re a little less happy with; the reverse onus of proof is still retained in a number of instances there, but across the board we’re starting to see some real movement and that’s extremely important,” he said.

NSW Attorney-General Greg Smith said the legislative changes remove a major hindrance to good businesses and he urged the Greens to adjust their thinking.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Directors’ liability limited
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Oct 19 2017
‘Ego status’ compelled ex-lawyer to defraud $2.97m, court told
Debarred lawyer John Gordon Bradfield told an NSW District Court that he was driven by “ego status...
Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA), Queensland’s new industrial manslaughter legislation,
Oct 19 2017
ALA welcomes ‘tough’ Qld manslaughter laws
The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) has welcomed Queensland’s new industrial manslaughter legisl...
Legal podcasts, tune in, microphone
Oct 19 2017
Legal podcasts you have to tune in to right now
The rise of the internet has hailed in a new dawn for storytelling. Here’s our top pick of podcast...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...