find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Criminal defence lawyer in hot water with police watchdog

Criminal defence lawyer in hot water with police watchdog

A Sydney defence solicitor, whose partner worked for the NSW Crime Commission, received excessive legal fees from the confiscated proceeds of crime, the Police Integrity Commission has found.

A Sydney defence solicitor, whose partner worked for the NSW Crime Commission (NSWCC), received excessive legal fees from the confiscated proceeds of crime, the Police Integrity Commission (PIC) has found.

A PIC report recommended that Salina Sadiq, the sole member of the firm Lloyd Truman Sadiq Solicitors and a former winner of the NSW Law Society’s president's award for her pro bono work, should face professional sanctions by the NSW Legal Services Commissioner (LSC) for her alleged involvement in the matter.

Sadiq, a registered migration agent, was given $150,000 in 2008 to represent three co-accused who eventually had their charges withdrawn, the report said.

The terms of the settlement also awarded the NSWCC $100,000 for its legal costs.

In another matter filed by the NSWCC in court the same year - that resulted in a guilty plea - Sadiq was paid $70,000.

“Again, the amount allowed for reasonable legal expenses was thus greatly in excess of the amount of expenses actually incurred,” said the PIC, before adding that Sadiq “derived a financial benefit substantially in excess of what would have been ‘reasonable’ legal expenses in the circumstances”.

The PIC has recommended Sadiq's partner, Lou Novakovic, be considered for prosecution for misconduct, giving misleading evidence and allegedly providing favourable work to Sadiq while he worked as an accountant for the NSWCC.

It did not recommend criminal prosecution for Sadiq but did call on the LSC to look at her alleged actions.

“Whilst it is beyond the scope of the PIC’s statutory functions to express an assessment or opinion as to whether Ms Sadiq’s practices amounted to conduct short of that required of a legal practitioner, it is of the view that there was evidence before it which warrants further examination in that regard by the relevant disciplinary body,” said the report.

It added that the PIC is of the opinion that consideration should be given to the taking of action against Sadiq in relation to possible professional misconduct, or possible unsatisfactory professional conduct.

When contacted by Lawyers Weekly about the possible disciplinary action, Legal Services Commissioner Steve Mark was unable to confirm or deny whether his office had received or initiated a complaint about Sadiq’s conduct.

Lawyers Weekly also contacted Lloyd Truman Sadiq Solicitors for comment but received no response.

In the PIC report, Sadiq is the subject of “substantial allegations”, including that she overcharged clients for legal services; that she made unjustified and excessive claims for costs and misled clients in relation to those costs; that she knowingly concealed matters relating to her financial affairs in order to avoid her taxation and/or professional obligations and/or liabilities, and that she was an accessory to the abuse of office of her partner, Novakovic.

Prior to becoming the principal of Lloyd Truman, Sadiq, who speaks Mandarin, Cantonese, Japanese, French and English, worked as a solicitor for Roach and Halligan.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Criminal defence lawyer in hot water with police watchdog
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...