find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Not-for-profits not so keen on regulator

Not-for-profits not so keen on regulator

An increased number of not-for-profit (NFP) organisations believe the new charity regulator will have a negative impact on compliance requirements, according to a new study.

The survey, commissioned by Makinson & d’Apice to gauge the NFP sector’s expectations of the Australian Charities and Not-For-Profits’ Commission (ACNC), showed the number of respondents with a negative view of the new regulator tripled in the last year.

“Our 2011 findings showed that about five per cent of organisations expected negative effects from the advent of the ACNC; where now around 15 per cent see it negatively,” said Bill d’Apice, partner at Makinson & d’Apice.

In the study, almost one third of organisations said they were not well informed about impending changes relating to the ACNC, while almost half were sceptical that the regulator could reduce compliance costs and reporting burdens.

Darren Fittler (pictured), head of Gilbert + Tobin’s third-sector advisory group, told Lawyers Weekly that there’s genuine uncertainty among NFP clients about the impending changes relating to the ACNC. 

“This is pretty massive reform,” said Fittler. “When you bring in a new regulator over anything there is going to be teething problems, so there is a bit of nervousness around what it will mean.”

“A lot of the actual requirements that the ACNC are putting upon the sector already exist at the moment in one way or another. So there’s the risk that the ACNC will result in the duplication of reporting as opposed to reducing it,” he added.

Despite the growing scepticism, nearly two-thirds of those surveyed felt there would be considerable benefit to the NFP sector as a whole in establishing a national framework for fundraising compliance.

The study showed almost half of the NFP sector sees significant continuing fundraising compliance burdens arising from different state regimes in operation unless a national regime can be established.

Fittler has voiced concerns that state governments might not agree on a uniformed national approach to compliance requirements.

“As this survey indicates, there’s concern that the states might not come along, that they might not agree to uniformity, that they might not agree to give up jurisdiction for governance over certain not-for-profit organisations.”

The study also indicated 75 per cent of religious and educational institutions believe their own organisation is unlikely to benefit from a national sector framework.

Respondents in this area said that the ACNC will not achieve the stated intention of streamlining administration of the NFP sector; instead, it will create a whole new level of compliance for a sector without the resources to respond.

Although the ACNC was launched last month, submissions are due on 15 February for the new draft regulations, which Fittler said will “put more meat on the bones” around what the new governance principals will be for NFP organisations.

He added that there has been a shift in mindset in the NFP sector in relation to spending on legal services.

“It is now seen as a legitimate expense … that you won’t be dragged over the coals for spending money on lawyers,” said Fittler.

“As this mindset shifts and becomes more acceptable, you’ll see more work for professional services coming from the NFP sector.” 

About 40 per cent of organisations in the Makinson & d’Apice survey operate in NSW; nearly 30 per cent at a national level and 10 per cent internationally.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Not-for-profits not so keen on regulator
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Lawyers warn against mandatory sentencing measures amid political jeers
Mandatory sentencing has become a topic for politicians on both sides of Federal Parliament to jostl...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...