find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Heat on media after coal hoax

Heat on media after coal hoax

Media outlets that published the press release that caused Whitehaven Coal’s share price to plummet could face a malicious falsehood suit if it’s determined they knew it was a fake, a media expert has claimed.

Whitehaven Coal has rejected reports that a media outlet published the press release after contacting the company and confirming the information it contained was false.

Even so, the incident casts a spotlight on media liability in facilitating a hoax that has serious market repercussions, according to media lawyer Justine Munsie (pictured), a partner at Sydney-based Addisons Lawyers.

The ANZ-branded release claimed the bank had withdrawn $1.2 billion in funding from Whitehaven’s Maules Creek project. Media outlets began reporting on the release on Monday (7 January) and investors responded by dumping stock, which caused the share price to plummet by 31 cents.

Munsie told Lawyers Weekly that Whitehaven could launch a malicious falsehood claim against media outlets that published the release when they knew it was untrue.

“Malicious falsehood is the most likely source of redress,” she said.

“Claims of malicious falsehood ... require proof that a statement was made maliciously ... for example, where the person making it knew it was false and the plaintiff suffers specific economic loss.”

Whitehaven could also accuse media outlets of misleading and deceptive conduct, continued Munsie, but the ‘publisher’s defence’ (Section 65A) in the Trade Practices Act 1974 provides a general exemption to most of the media from liability for publishing misleading or deceptive material.

Whitehaven’s chairman Mark Vaile told the ABC that he plans to complain to the Press Council about media reporting of the hoax press release. Whitehaven declined to comment on the basis of the complaint.

The anti-coal activist behind the hoax, Jonathan Moylan, is currently being investigated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). If convicted of disseminating false information that could impact on market securities, Moylan could face a 10-year prison term or hefty fines.

In October last year, trading in Macmahon Holdings was halted when hoax emails prompted takeover speculation. Retailer David Jones was also the victim of a hoax a few months earlier when an entity called ‘EB Private Equity’ supposedly launched a takeover bid.

Munsie warned media outlets to check the accuracy of press releases by contacting the source or conducting a background check. She admitted, however, that this level of due diligence is not always practical.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Heat on media after coal hoax
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...