find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Lawyers divided on bullying rules

Lawyers divided on bullying rules

Two employment practice heads have expressed conflicting views on the Federal Government’s decision to allow workers to take bullying complaints to the Fair Work Commission.

Workplace Relations Minister Bill Shorten announced on Tuesday (12 February) the Government’s response to a parliamentary inquiry into workplace bullying, which included proposed amendments to the Fair Work Act that would allow workers to have their complaints heard by the Fair Work Commission.

Josh Bornstein (pictured), principal of Maurice Blackburn’s employment & industrial law practice, welcomed the move by the Government, claiming it was the most important recommendation to come out of last year’s inquiry.

Bornstein, who has represented a range of employees from executives to wharfies, told Lawyers Weekly that the obvious benefit is that bullying complaints would be dealt with more swiftly and cheaply at a federal level, rather than through the courts.

“It will be a quicker and more accessible route for individuals,” he said.

Joydeep Hor, managing principal of People + Culture Strategies, argued, however, that the Fair Work Commission is an inappropriate venue for bullying complaints.

“The body that has its genesis in industrial relations matters, the making of enterprise agreements and unfair dismissal claims, should not be dealing with matters that would be better addressed in the human rights context,” he said.

He also criticised the Labor Party reforms as being a ploy to win popularity in the lead up to the federal election.

The employment law veterans also disagreed on whether the new laws would mean more work for lawyers. Hor, who advises employers, admitted the changes would be “great for business, no question”, while Bornstein played down any benefit to the legal community.

“Lawyers won’t necessarily be required to be involved. Some [parties] may want lawyers, unions or other representatives instead,” Bornstein said.

Time wasting

Hor also argued that the Government’s proposal could see a rise in vexatious claims. Bornstein, on the other hand, claimed that a series of safeguards, which include a national definition of workplace bullying and exemptions for certain employer behaviour, would minimise vexatious litigation.

The new definition of bullying outlined in the proposed amendment to the Fair Work Act is: “Bullying, harassment or victimisation means repeated unreasonable behaviour directed towards a worker or a group of workers that creates a risk to health and safety.”

The legislation will also recognise that the term bullying does not include performance management conducted in a reasonable manner.

Bornstein claimed that the new laws will help stamp out bullying and, ultimately, improve workplace productivity. In 2010, the Productivity Commission reported that workplace bullying cost the economy more than $6 billion every year.

However, Hor argued that the approach is unlikely to have any impact on the incidence of bullying in the workplace, pointing to the proliferation of sexual harassment complaints despite the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act to back his claim.

“It’s hard to see anything but the same thing happening for bullying,” he said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers divided on bullying rules
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...