find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
View from the top: Michael Bradley; Fair game?

View from the top: Michael Bradley; Fair game?

In the inaugural 'View from the top' column, Michael Bradley, managing partner of Sydney-based Marque Lawyers, says that if the profession is serious about having women in partnership positions it has to change the game of play.

Introducing the first of The New Lawyer's 'View from the top' section, in which law firm leaders open the door to their high-rise offices and offer The New Lawyer readers an exclusive peek within. 

Michael Bradley, managing partner of Sydney-based Marque Lawyers, says if the profession is serious about having women in partnership positions, it has to change the game of play. 

NOW let’s see. For many years, more than 50 per cent of law graduates have been female. The halls of the big firms are largely populated by young female lawyers in dark suits and serious hair.

By partnership time, they’re almost all gone. The old “it takes time to filter through” defence no longer washes, the women have been in the building for ages now, way longer than the time it takes to make partner. But they’re not making it. Where are they?

They’re long gone. Inhouse. Overseas. Raising kids. Making movies. Writing books. For the women who gave up or left the chase, there are thousands of unique stories, epiphanies and graceful exits. All those clever, creative lawyers lost to the profession, what a shame. And the persistent and seemingly impermeable gender imbalance at the top just begs the question. Why?

It’s not because women aren’t as bright, focused, committed or enterprising. Come on, we know this isn’t about talent or aptitude. For the most part they’re leaving out of conscious choice. As to why, my personal conclusion is that they’re making the obvious and sensible choice. For all the endless talk about flexibility and work/life balance, law firms haven’t really changed at all.

It’s all very well to sit a pregnant senior associate down and discuss her options with her - part time work, work from home, the firm crèche and a discreet room in the corner for expressing milk, but while that conversation continues to take place in a context, both physical and cultural, that hasn’t actually changed in the past 30 years, it’s all just a bit of a joke.

Here, have a BlackBerry and remote access from home. We’ll pay you for three days while expecting you to work five and, by the way, you can’t tell the clients you’re a part timer. Even so, you should know your career prospects will be held back by your part time status, but that’s a fair trade-off hey.

The wonder is that any of them stay around. Of course, the parenthood issue is not the whole story, but it’s a big part. If we’re serious about having women in partnership in appropriate proportions, then the rules of the game have to change.

We advertised recently for a senior property lawyer to work on a casual, flexible basis. We discovered that there’s a treasure trove out there of seriously talented, experienced women who want to work flexibly, really flexibly. Their options are as limited as law firms’ imaginations.

And we implemented our own affirmative action policy. It’s called Men at Marque, and we’re currently fighting for the right to have the cricket on the big screen. We’re losing. But we’re outnumbered three to one, so it figures.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

View from the top: Michael Bradley; Fair game?
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...