find the latest legal job
Banking Associate - 1-6PQE - Allen & Overy
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: United Kingdom
· Banking Associate - 1-6 PQE - Allen & Overy
View details
Academic Dean and Head of School of the TC Beirne School of Law
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· An outstanding opportunity · Provide educational, research and organisational leadership
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Arncliffe NSW 2205
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Beware the silence

Beware the silence

John Chisholm says it's time the profession pulled its head out of the sand on the problem of time-based billing._x000D_

John Chisholm says it's time the profession pulled its head out of the sand on the problem of time-based billing.

A whole raft of eminent people - from the heads of judiciary in several jurisdictions, a number of prominent corporate counsel, the overwhelming majority of young lawyers who detest being made to account for every six minutes of their day (and night), the legal press, the Victorian Attorney General and now the Federal Attorney General - have been calling on the legal profession to reduce [or eradicate] its addiction to time based billing.

Apart from most law firms, the bodies keeping quiet on the issue include lawyer representative bodies such as Law Council of Australia and the state law societies, the practice management vendors that make their living from timesheet entries and the legal consultants who perpetuate the "$ x hours" leverage model as best practice.

In regard to the silence... is it not just a little ironic that for all the good they do in promoting and supporting cost of access justice issues and upholding the reputation of lawyers in the community, they seemingly fail to appreciate that time-based billing is a major factor in both the burdensome cost of access to justice and the diminished reputation of the legal profession in the wider community? 

Even if such esteemed organisations do appreciate this, they are horribly conflicted by their role as the Union of the legal profession, which means anything that could possibly diminish the financial returns to its members cannot be supported.

With all these vested interests working overtime, coupled with the innate conservatism of our profession, is it any wonder -notwithstanding the pent up demand for change and the irrefutable business and social case for its demise - the profession clings to time-based billing like a baby suckling from its mother's breast? Yet, some time the baby has to be weaned!

Is the majority of the profession going to wait until governments or clients force it to change? Governments can force the change in two ways - by bringing in yet another set of regulations, or use their considerable strength as purchasers of legal services to force law firms to move away from time based billing.

What a shame, and what a blight on our profession, if this is how it is going to come about when we could quite easily change ourselves. At the same time [we could] recapture some of the moral high ground we have clearly lost since time-based billing was introduced for the betterment of future generations of our profession and clients.

I am sure that by adopting the ostriche pose the world (or such of the world as you can see and hear under sand) appears calm and safe. The only trouble is you cannot see what is coming your way until it actually hits you.

John Chisholm is the former chief executive of law firm Middletons. He now owns his own law firm consultancy, Chisholm consulting. 

Like this story? Read more:

Book commemorates diamond milestone for WA law society

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending


Beware the silence
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Gavel, legal book, criminal lawyers
Jan 19 2018
Three criminal lawyers named NSW magistrates
The NSW Attorney-General has announced the appointment of three new local court magistrates. ...
Warning
Jan 18 2018
Lawyer highlights ‘unintended consequences’ on SSM estate planning
A succession lawyer has warned that the right for same-sex couples to legally marry could have a sub...
drug rehabilitation services available in rural and remote communities
Jan 18 2018
ALS survey shines spotlight on insufficient rehabilitation services
A new survey posted by the Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) has revealed an alarming insight into ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...