find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer (3-5 years PQE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· National firm acting for domestic and multinational clients
View details
Lawyer – CTP Insurance (2-3 years)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Well-regarded team offering mentoring and career development
View details
Are we up to date yet?

Are we up to date yet?

Does the new electronic transactions Bill go far enough? Middletons partner Dudley Kneller and lawyer Kate Price write_x000D_

Does the new electronic transactions Bill go far enough?  Middletons partner Dudley Kneller and lawyer Kate Price write

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland has just introduced the Electronic Transactions Amendment Bill 2011 into the House of Representatives, following extensive consultation dating back to 2008. New South Wales and Tasmania have quickly passed the amendments and the other Australian States and Territories are expected to pass amendments to their own legislation over the next 12 months.

The bill amends the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 and is an attempt to bring Australia's electronic transactions legislation into line with advances in technology. This is no mean feat and the bill is very much a step in the right direction. Amongst other things the bill seeks to clarify that a contract can be formed via an automated system, addresses the uncertainty around a contracting party’s location online and also simplifies the process by which transactions or other laws may be exempt from the Act.

The bill is a welcome initiative and many of the proposed updates simply reflect what is now modern business practice, and the move by consumers to an online world. We all take for granted our business dealings conducted via email and we are all now pretty comfortable buying music online (well mostly anyway!). When we click "I accept" the bill now confirms the action of forming a contract even though the contract is formed with an automated message system.

The amendments also mean that a contract can be formed by sending messages over a secure system that requires the other party to log in and retrieve a message – a means of communication that is becoming more and more popular as concerns about email security grow.

Importantly, once the bill is enacted, Australia’s electronic transactions regime will reflect internationally recognised legal standards on e-commerce and Australia will be able to accede to the UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts 2005. Australia has been under some pressure to accede to the convention with intense lobbying by industry to date. When enacted Australia will join a further 18 countries, including trading partners Singapore and the Republic of Korea, who have signed the convention to date.

While the Act is technology neutral and allows people to determine the technology they use to form a contract (and will remain so if the bill is enacted), has the bill gone far enough? Inevitably technology will continue to advance at the speed of light with the law once again falling behind. We are unlikely to be in the same place in 3 or 5 years time as business and consumers continue to embrace technology changes and new ways of engaging. At what point will they become hamstrung by the existing legal framework governing these new engagements.

Let's not shy away from the fact that the bill is an important step towards giving Australian business comfort that their business practices comply with the law. Perhaps we can suggest that that the government review the Act a little more regularly to ensure that it doesn't fall so far behind business and consumer practices in the future. Maybe a difficult task but, with the online retail marketplace nudging $28 billion this year, one worth thinking about!

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Are we up to date yet?
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...