find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
June the month of truth for firms: expert

June the month of truth for firms: expert

Firm of the past or firm of the future? Ask yourself, says John Chisholm, what did you do in June?

Firm of the past or firm of the future. Ask yourself, says John Chisholm, what did you do in June? 

As another financial year comes to an end did you, like many firms, spend much time and energy in the month of June on things such as staff performance reviews, negotiating your staff salary reviews; agonising over how much (if any) the market can stand for hourly rack rate increases from 1 July; finalising the new financial year's budget;scraping around trying to find cash; and writing off unbilled and unrecoverable WIP?

And during June did you find time to service your clients as well? Does any of this sound even vaguely familiar?

It should because nothing much has really changed in the last 20 or 30 years in this regard for many firms irrespective of their size and location.

It is also familiar because most firms stick to the same old business model and paradigm, focussing on revenue as their prime goal.

We call these firms Firms Of the Past.

Thank goodness there is a small but increasing number of firms that, whilst experiencing other challenges during June, do not experience all those that Firms Of The Past do- or at least not to the same extent.

They are firms made up of people who are innovative, have become tired and disillusioned with the old firm business model and have realised there are much better ways of practicing law which benefit themselves, their staff and their clients all at the same time.

Their primary is focus on profitability, not revenue.

And they spent the month of June not undertaking staff reviews. Their staff appraisals-if they have them at all- happen regularly during the year and are based on Key Predictive Indicators- not Key Performance Indicators.Their team members remuneration is based on Key Predicative Indicators and other accountabilities such as turnaround time, what their clients think of their performance,teamwork, coming up with innovative solutions, encouraging creativity, and people's contribution to providing value to their clients and profit to their firms-not on hours worked and billed.

They did not spend June on working out rate increases as these firms have prices for individual clients on individual matters or long term retainers, not hourly rates. And rates are not prices.

They worked on team budgets built around a range of targets including profitability -not personal exertion revenue targets.

They did not have to waste their time undertaking debtor purges as they do not experience the same lock up and cash issues Firms Of The Past do because they agree their prices and terms of trade up front with their clients and are paid all or something in advance of doing the work -not waiting until after the work is done. And clients who agree prices up front pay more quickly and do not dispute bills.

What did you do in June? 

These firms either do not record time so do not have WIP lock up or if they record time the WIP is largely irrelevant as it is the scope of the work, project managing that work and the fee agreed up front that counts.

These Firms spent most of their June working hard at continually providing increasing value to their clients.

We call these firms Firms Of The Future.

John Chisholm is a law firm consultant.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

June the month of truth for firms: expert
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...