find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
How to... write a social media policy

How to... write a social media policy

In the next instalment of The New Lawyer's 'how to...' column, Angus Macinnis challenges the idea that social media policies are not important. If something goes wrong, there will be no LOLs.

Angus Macinnis, senior associate at law firm DibbsBarker, challenges the idea that social media policies are not important in law firms. If something goes wrong, he said, there will be no LOLs.

If you think that a social media policy isn’t something which is needed by your clients (or by your firm), you may wish to think again.  In an unfair dismissal case decided by Fair Work Australia (FWA) late last year, an employer was trying to argue that it had fairly terminated an employee for material which the employee had posted on Facebook. The employer did not have a social media policy.  Commissioner Roberts of FWA said, “in the current electronic age, this is not sufficient”.  The employer lost the case. The employee was reinstated.

Social media policies don’t only become relevant when termination of employment is being considered.  Indeed, the primary function of a social media policy is to provide guidance, and to ensure that employees are aware of the ways in which their social media use can affect their employment, especially in circumstances where the social media use occurs outside the scope of employment. 

So, the first step is to make sure that the social media policy is consistent with, and refers to, other relevant policies (in particular, policies dealing with IT and email use, confidential information, and harassment, bullying and EEO).  If your client (or firm) doesn’t have those policies, then you need those – in particular, if email and internet use is being monitored without a policy, that’s likely to be a breach of the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 (NSW), which is a good thing to avoid. 

The policy should then identify the ways in which social media use affects the reputation of the employer (or the reputation of the employee, if that is relevant to the employee’s ability to perform their job).  This will depend on the employer’s industry; issues arise in schools which don’t arise in the finance industry (and vice versa).  Where professional conduct rules apply (as is the case with lawyers) the policy should provide guidance as to the application of those rules.  It is worth spending some time thinking about the issues which may arise in the workplace in which the policy will be used, because a template designed for a very different workplace may miss some key issues.

To protect reputation, the simple rule which the policy should explain is to always assume that the person who you would least like to see a social media posting (be it a client, a judge, or your mother) will see the posting.  If that would have consequences for your reputation (or that of your employer) the posting is one you shouldn’t make. 

Equally, employees shouldn’t assume that because they are using a pseudonym, they are safe to say things to which they wouldn’t put their names.  Recently, Twitter users discovered that the user they knew as @Geeklawyer was actually English barrister David Harris, whose identity came to broader attention because he was fined £2,500 by the Bar Standards Board for bringing the legal profession into disrepute as a result of his pseudonymous tweets.

Finally, be brief.  Don’t spend twelve pages of the policy trying to define “social media” – there are as many definitions of “social media” as there are people proffering such definitions, and by the time you’ve finished, there will be a new social media platform which renders your definition obsolete.  You can, if you wish, be poetic; Quatrain LI of The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám:

"The Moving Finger writes: and, having writ,

Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit

Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,

Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it."

This makes the useful point that information posted into social media channels can be impossible to delete. But if you find yourself with twenty pages of “thou shalt nots”, you are on the wrong track.  And remember to lead by example – updating your Facebook status with “[name] is writing a social media policy so my dopey employees don’t get themselves into trouble LOL” is probably not the best way to start! 

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

How to... write a social media policy
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...