find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Oversight and human rights for Hicks’ trial committee

Oversight and human rights for Hicks’ trial committee

AN OVERSIGHT committee manned by a panel of legal experts has been formed by the Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) to advise the Australian Government on the second proposed military commission…

AN OVERSIGHT committee manned by a panel of legal experts has been formed by the Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) to advise the Australian Government on the second proposed military commission system to try David Hicks.

President of the ALA, Simon Morrison, will work with notable QCs Tom Percy and Julian Burnside in an effort to provide the Government with a pool of legal wisdom besides that which arrives packaged in the form of US assurances.

“Last time around our Australian Government was assured by the US Government that the process was proper. It turned out that is wasn’t, courtesy of the Supreme Court judgment,” Morrison said.

“We want to have a close look at it this time, to give advice to the Australian Government so that it doesn’t simply rely on assurances from other governments.”

The new regulations in the form of the Manual for Military Commissions were submitted to Congress two weeks ago, drawing immediate criticism from the Law Council of Australia for offering little or no improvement on the earlier model.

And with a proper analysis of the 240-page document yet to be completed by the oversight committee, Morrison had still seen enough to share the Law Council’s dismay.

“Some of the more salient features in the regs … are of concern,” he said. “For example, the rule involving hearsay, and hearsay within hearsay is permissible, which is quite a worry. Evidence by coercion still goes in.”

But along with specific flaws in the regulations, the overall structure has not changed. “The same body that wants to prosecute, is the same body that picks the structure of the process and determines the outcome,” Morrison said.

The aim of the committee is to dissect the regulations and draft a submission, which they hoped to have before Attorney-General Philip Ruddock by today, as Lawyers Weekly went to press.

Burnside and Percy were chosen for the panel because the ALA wanted “the best mix of skills in both criminal law and human rights,” he said. “Between those two QCs you have among Australia’s finest, so it’s a good combination.”

And as a spokesperson for the ALA, Morrison expressed the frustration the association has felt over the five years that Hicks has been held without trial. “Like most people, we’re utterly concerned with the delay,” he said. “Our position is simple — regardless of the guilt or innocence of [Hicks], delaying the judicial process like this is just destroying him.”

Reacting to reports that Prime Minister John Howard had communicated to the US his expectation that Hicks be charged by the middle of February, Morrison said that “up until now … there has been no effort by the Australian Government to bring this to a head. And we’re pleased that they are at least attempting to do that”.

The increased attention that Howard and Ruddock are giving to Hicks’ plight could be explained by “the political climate at the moment, with an election looming this year,” Morrison said. “Personally, I think the penny is starting to drop. The rest of the country is realising what a travesty this is, and it’s high time they did something about it.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Oversight and human rights for Hicks’ trial committee
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...