find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Profession calls for review of age limits

Profession calls for review of age limits

A DECIDEDLY involuntary retirement of a NSW Court of Appeal judge has brought the issue of judicial retirement onto the agenda for legal bodies, which this week told Lawyers Weekly the time had…

A DECIDEDLY involuntary retirement of a NSW Court of Appeal judge has brought the issue of judicial retirement onto the agenda for legal bodies, which this week told Lawyers Weekly the time had come for review.

Despite having reached the age limit for NSW judges, Justice Ken Handley has expressed that he would like to carry on. Though he has been welcomed to the NSW Supreme Court as an acting judge, his retirement ceremony last week stirred members of the profession to state their case on the matter.

NSW Chief Justice Jim Spigelman referred in a speech to the “statutory compulsion” under which Justice Handley was retiring. He said it would be “wasteful, bordering on the ridiculous, if you could not serve as an acting judge for more than three years because of the existing statutory prohibition”.

Judges are currently given a career deadline, which varies in each state. In all states and territories except NSW and Tasmania, the compulsory retiring age is 70, while it is 72 in the other two states. For magistrates, it is 65 in most jurisdictions, except in Victoria where it is 70, and NSW and Tasmania, where it is 72.

Chief Justice Spigelman took the opportunity last week to call for a review of the compulsory retiring ages.

“Some such age is, of course, appropriate for judges in view of the inability to remove a judge whose decline in powers does not quite reach the required depths. However, as your own energy and mental acuity attests, an increase in the age to 75 for judges and 78 for acting judges is now appropriate,” he said, referring to Justice Handley himself.

While the NSW Bar Association does not have an official policy on the matter, president Michael Slattery told Lawyers Weekly that he will be putting it to the Bar Council this week.

“But, commonsense suggests that increasing the retirement age, giving greater flexibility is good for the career satisfaction for the judges concerned who want to stay, and it’s good for the state because they get more service from the judges — it’s good all round, but provided they are not past it,” Slattery said.

Slattery noted, however, that the compulsory limits have worked well until now, noting that “you retire at 72 and the chief justice gives you a yearly approval to 75 — he works out whether you’re okay or not. And that actually works quite well”.

The Law Council of Australia also has no objection to a review of the retirement age of judges, said president Tim Bugg.

“There have been instances of highly active, highly skilled members of the judiciary who had to retire because of the retirement age and they could have quite capably continued in their role for a number of years.

“If that’s what’s motivated Justice Spigelman’s comments, then it may be appropriate to have a review. But these things have to be monitored. If change is appropriate then you ought to consider it carefully. We certainly wouldn’t speak against it but I am not sure it’s a pressing issue,” Bugg said.

The Law Council president also noted that there may be an issue if a member of the judiciary is keen to carry on, while he is clearly not up to the job. He suggested the current rules would protect the profession against this problematic issue.

“If you have a barrier where people have to go then that is what happens, rather than someone saying to you ‘you’ve lost the plot, you have to go’.”

Additional reporting by Alex Boxsell.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Profession calls for review of age limits
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...