find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Lawyers condemn move away from human rights laws

Lawyers condemn move away from human rights laws

Australian lawyers are voicing their concerns about the government's move yesterday to shy away from a National Human Rights Act for Australia.

AUSTRALIAN lawyers are voicing their concerns about the government’s move yesterday to shy away from a National Human Rights Act for Australia.

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland yesterday launched a Human Rights Framework that outlines measures to protect human rights in Australia. But a notable omission to the new measures is the promise of a Human Rights Act, for which the legal profession has pushed for years.

McClelland announced yesterday the changes would have “broad effect” and would enhance an understanding of human rights. It includes an investment of $12 million in education initiatives, and the establishment of a Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights to provide better scrutiny of legislation.

Lawyers say the framework does not go far enough.

The Government’s move comes after a comprehensive report, released in October and developed by the National Human Rights Committee, recommended the adoption of the laws.

The Law Council of Australia and the Law Institute of Victoria have both expressed support for an Act, and lawyers now say the Government has “missed a golden opportunity”.

Law Institute of Victoria president Steven Stevens said the government has missed an opportunity to show national leadership.

Victoria has had a human rights charter since 2007, he said, and “the sky hasn't fallen in”.

"On the contrary, the Victorian experience has shown that legislative protection of human rights leads to better government decisions and the rights of people being protected.”

"The courts, the government, the public service and welfare agencies operate under our Charter and it is playing an important role in protecting rights of all Victorians," he said.

Stevens said a Human Rights Act would have better protected marginalised and disadvantaged people, improved the quality and accountability of government policy and service delivery, and bolstered the government's Social Inclusion Agenda.

"There is no doubt that an Australian Human Rights Act would have made a genuine positive difference," Stevens said.

The LIV submission to the National Human Rights Consultation supports the establishment of a National Human Rights Act based on the Victorian Human Rights Charter but with further protections.

The legal body yesterday welcomed McClelland's announcement that the Government would streamline federal anti-discrimination legislation into one single comprehensive law.

The LIV also welcomed the establishment of a joint Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights to review new legislation for human rights compatibility and the decision to require Statements of Compatibility to be tabled with all new Bills, a provision Victoria already has.



Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers condemn move away from human rights laws
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...