find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders

Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders

How, and how often, courts issue suppression orders will more more rigorously scrutinised with the introduction of new laws. _x000D_

HOW, and how often, courts issue suppression orders will more more rigorously scrutinised with the introduction of new laws. 

The Government has introduced legislation to give Commonwealth courts clearer powers on suppression orders and vexatious litigants.


“There has been growing concern about the volume and breadth of suppression orders made by some Australian courts and while the concerns have been directed at state courts, it is important this issue be addressed nationally,” Attorney General Robert McClelland said. 


“This Bill provides a clearer approach to the granting of suppression orders, which puts front and centre the fundamental importance of the open justice principle.”


The Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011 sets out in greater detail how suppression orders should be made, and emphasises that courts must consider the public interest in open justice before making a suppression order.


The Bill is based on the model suppression order law developed by the former Standing Committee of Attorneys-General in 2010. 


This Bill has been amended from the model law so that it does not broaden the grounds on which suppression orders can be made from those that currently apply.


“I welcomed the opportunity to further discuss the model law at last week’s meeting of the Standing Council on Law and Justice, where it was decided that Western Australia, Victoria and South Australia would further consider the model law.


“I am confident that these reforms will assist courts to appropriately craft suppression orders, so that they are only made when they are clearly justified, and in as narrow terms as necessary to achieve their purpose, recognising the important rule that open justice plays in upholding the rule of law,” said McClelland.


The Bill will also improve the powers available for the federal courts to deal with vexatious litigants.


“Unfortunately courts can be caught up with proceedings that are vexatious in nature and take away time from other litigants,” he said.


“This Bill provides a clearer process for dealing with repeat vexatious litigants to minimise their impact on the court system, while protecting their right to initiate worthwhile legal action.”


The Bill will also clarify and reinforcethe Federal Court’s powers to control the discovery process during litigation to prevent excessive costs being incurred, in response to recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission’s report Managing Discovery.


The Bill will also allow the Administrative Appeals Tribunal more flexibility in the payment of application fees in Tribunal proceedings, and remove the limits that prevent  Family Law Magistrates in Western Australia hearing family law property matters worth over a certain amount.


“Greater transparency and efficiency in court and tribunal proceedings is important in ensuring fair and equitable access to justice,” said McClelland.


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...