find the latest legal job
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Adelaide CBD · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
Freelance Project Finance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Australia
· Vario are looking for freelance lawyers with experience in project finance ideally within the renewable energy sector
View details
Vario Freelance Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Australia
· We are looking for lawyers who appreciate the endless possibilities that a freelance career can offer.
View details
Freelance Construction Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· We are looking for construction lawyers who appreciate the endless possibilities that a freelance career can offer.
View details
Banking Associate - 1-6PQE - Allen & Overy
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: United Kingdom
· Banking Associate - 1-6 PQE - Allen & Overy
View details
Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders

Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders

How, and how often, courts issue suppression orders will more more rigorously scrutinised with the introduction of new laws. _x000D_

HOW, and how often, courts issue suppression orders will more more rigorously scrutinised with the introduction of new laws. 


The Government has introduced legislation to give Commonwealth courts clearer powers on suppression orders and vexatious litigants.

 

“There has been growing concern about the volume and breadth of suppression orders made by some Australian courts and while the concerns have been directed at state courts, it is important this issue be addressed nationally,” Attorney General Robert McClelland said. 

 

“This Bill provides a clearer approach to the granting of suppression orders, which puts front and centre the fundamental importance of the open justice principle.”

 

The Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011 sets out in greater detail how suppression orders should be made, and emphasises that courts must consider the public interest in open justice before making a suppression order.

 

The Bill is based on the model suppression order law developed by the former Standing Committee of Attorneys-General in 2010. 

 

This Bill has been amended from the model law so that it does not broaden the grounds on which suppression orders can be made from those that currently apply.

 

“I welcomed the opportunity to further discuss the model law at last week’s meeting of the Standing Council on Law and Justice, where it was decided that Western Australia, Victoria and South Australia would further consider the model law.

 

“I am confident that these reforms will assist courts to appropriately craft suppression orders, so that they are only made when they are clearly justified, and in as narrow terms as necessary to achieve their purpose, recognising the important rule that open justice plays in upholding the rule of law,” said McClelland.

 

The Bill will also improve the powers available for the federal courts to deal with vexatious litigants.

 

“Unfortunately courts can be caught up with proceedings that are vexatious in nature and take away time from other litigants,” he said.

 

“This Bill provides a clearer process for dealing with repeat vexatious litigants to minimise their impact on the court system, while protecting their right to initiate worthwhile legal action.”

 

The Bill will also clarify and reinforcethe Federal Court’s powers to control the discovery process during litigation to prevent excessive costs being incurred, in response to recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission’s report Managing Discovery.

 

The Bill will also allow the Administrative Appeals Tribunal more flexibility in the payment of application fees in Tribunal proceedings, and remove the limits that prevent  Family Law Magistrates in Western Australia hearing family law property matters worth over a certain amount.

 

“Greater transparency and efficiency in court and tribunal proceedings is important in ensuring fair and equitable access to justice,” said McClelland.

 

Like this story? Read more:

Book commemorates diamond milestone for WA law society

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending


Courts handed strict rules on suppression orders
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Debate rises over Victorian judiciary attack
06:04
Debate rises over Victorian judiciary attack
The Victorian Bar has become the latest to go on record condemning recent political attacks on the V...
Michelle Quigley QC
06:00
Vic Barrister who helped stop major heritage redevelopment joins Supreme Court
Michelle Quigley QC, who assisted a coalition to oppose the redevelopment of St Heliers villa estate...
Building, construction
06:00
Building for NSW coroner’s complex slated for early 2019
Efforts to relocate the state coroner’s facilities from Glebe to Lidcombe are on track, according ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...