find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Lawyers warned about document retention

Lawyers warned about document retention

LAWYERS WHO lose documents, or have rodents eat them, were on the radar of the legal regulator in New South Wales this year, which is now decidedly cracking down on the problem. The intention…

LAWYERS WHO lose documents, or have rodents eat them, were on the radar of the legal regulator in New South Wales this year, which is now decidedly cracking down on the problem.

The intention was made clear in an Office of the Legal Services Commission (OLSC) 2005-06 annual report, released last week.

“Losing files, or having rodents eat them, swept away in a flood or accidentally shredded) is not all that uncommon,” the OLSC said in its report.

In an interview with Lawyers Weekly, Legal Services Commissioner Steve Mark said this is a real problem for the profession. The OLSC is now trying to ascertain how to deal with lawyers and firms for which this is a common practice.

“Unfortunately, it can happen in any office. For the most part it’s something that can’t be sheeted home to anyone in particular — and very rarely to a lawyer,” he said.

“What can you do as a regulator?” Mark asked, acknowledging he can’t search the office himself.

“If you could prove that a big firm had intended to destroy evidence — which we have not been able to but I can’t talk about that — that is a strike off offence and I would prosecute instantly.

“But it is difficult evidence to get. Someone can say, ‘Oh sorry, I shredded the wrong document’. So it is difficult to be able to establish the requisite standard of proof to discipline. And that is often the case in the ‘I lost the document, I can’t find the file’ defence,” he said.

The OLSC had planned to chase up more lawyers for losing documents in the 2005-06 year. It has pushed for solicitors to make greater efforts to replace files that have been lost. It said that some lawyers had paid for new title deeds, and some had implored other lawyers to provide copies of documents as a result. Some have requested courts provide old record, and others spend hundreds of dollars on copying files, the OLSC report said. “In one case, [we have seen lawyers] translating a letter into Japanese to attempt to recover a lost birth certificate.”

Disciplinary action rarely follows a lost document, Mark said, usually because it is so difficult to prove that a document has been wilfully destroyed or lost. “Under the Legal Profession Act, to deal with something as a disciplinary matter, you have to reach the standards set by the Act and courts for unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct. Both of these areas require a certain degree of provable wilfulness. To be disciplinary for a conduct breach, you have to prove some wilfulness. You would have to prove that someone wanted to do something and wanted to achieve a negative result. So you would go into the old document retention policies,” he said.

Of the 21,000 lawyers in NSW, 50 of these account for 8 per cent, or 35,000, of all complaints made against practitioners, the OLSC noted in its report. While some of these 50 have been struck off, others have retired and gone overseas, and some are still practising.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers warned about document retention
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Violence
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...