find the latest legal job
Monash University Director Workplace Relations
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Exceptional senior leadership role
View details
Personal Injury Lawyer - Melbourne Eastern Suburbs - 2-5 years PAE
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Lilydale VIC 3140
· Fulfilling role as part of a small team in a positive workplace
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· In-house opportunity · Be part of our engine for success in a high growth business
View details
Trainer/Assessor Diploma of Legal Services
Category: Other | Location: Liverpool NSW 2170
· 3 Days Per Week · 9am - 4pm
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Adelaide CBD · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
Employers protected in unfair dismissal claims

Employers protected in unfair dismissal claims

The Industrial Relations Commission has ruled that employers should be protected from costs incurred when defending unreasonable unfair dismissal claims.

THE Australian Industrial Relations Commission has ruled that employers should be protected from costs incurred when defending unreasonable unfair dismissal claims.

In a full bench sitting, the Commission found a legal representative for a dismissed employee was wrong to continue legal proceedings when they knew the employee had no justified argument.

The case G. Dircks v JimRoy Pty Ltd involved a dismissed employee, Natasha Vukadinovic, and her legal representative Gary Dircks, who were pursuing the previous employer, JimRoy, for a financial settlement. This was despite Dircks' acknowledgement to JimRoy's lawyer, law firm Deacons' partner Stuart Kollmorgen, that he could not dispute that Vukadinovic had lied about her parents' death in order to receive compassionate leave.

In making his judgement on the case AIRC Commissioner John Tolley said he was satisfied that Dircks was well aware of the hopelessness of his client's case and forced him to pay for some of JimRoy’s legal costs.


Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network