find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Overcharging still rife: report

Overcharging still rife: report

The legal industry still has some work to do on overcharging clients, with a new report claiming the act is rife.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The legal industry still has some work to do on the practice of overcharging, with a new report claiming the act is rife.

Consumer organisation Choice has released a report claiming consumers are getting a “raw deal” from legal practitioners.

In one case examined by Choice a lawyer charged $750 for typing a three-page document and $40 for receiving a message to return a phone call.

In another case Russell, who engaged a lawyer acquaintance to handle his mother's estate , received a bill for almost $8000, with a costs disclosure document he claims he was not shown or told about previously.

And these cases are not alone. In the 2007-08 financial year, 827 complaints were lodged with Victoria’s Legal Services Commissioner relating to overcharging, while in South Australia almost 40 per cent of cases at the state’s Legal Practitioners Conduct Board related to overbilling.

In the same period, complaints about legal costs comprised 23.5 per cent of all written complaints received by the NSW Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC).

“The generalisation that lawyers over charge is the perception out there- it’s the challenge for lawyers to educate their clients and bring to the fore their value proposition,” said Mills Oakley Lawyers partner, Warren Scott.

“I think often while a client may raise it in a joking fashion there is some seriousness to it.”

Scott understands the concerns of consumers who are often unfamiliar with legal billing systems, but said consumers were starting to become more informed about the value of some legal services.

“I think people are seeing that paying a reasonably high hourly rate is acceptable as long as the practitioner has experience and is not learning on the job,” he said. “I think that they have a better understand these days of value for service.”

One of the main reasons overcharging occurs is because interactions with lawyers are often infrequent he said.  

“It is more project based work rather than an ongoing relationship.”

Scott claims seeing the wrong legal practitioner for the job can also lead to what can seem like exuberant fees.

“People are going to see a specialist in a particular area and getting charged accordingly. But often, people are going to see the micro surgeon instead of the general practitioner, when really a GP could have helped them.”

However, it’s not all bad news, with the increasing number of firms and more independent operators opening, Scotts predicts the increased competition will eliminate the unscrupulous operators.

If that doesn’t work, there are moves to reform the legal billing complaints system, which is currently overseen by 55 bodies across the country, to bring it under a national regulator. The reforms include uniform rules on lawyers’ trust accounts and costs disclosure, fines for any breaches of provisions adopted and a new regulation under which the principals of law firms – not their solicitors or any other person – would approve bills. The new legislation is expected to be drafted before May 2010.
Overcharging still rife: report
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...