find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
Firm denies $700k costing for WorkCover

Firm denies $700k costing for WorkCover

Claims that WorkCover South Australia spent $700,000 on legal fees for a case thrown out of court are incorrect, according to the firm.

CLAIMS that WorkCover South Australia spent $700,000 on legal fees for a case thrown out of court are wrong according to the firm. 


Managing partner at Johnson Winter & Slattery, Peter Slattery, told The New Lawyer that “the figures you see in the media are completely wrong”. 


This revelation comes just a day after The New Lawyer and other news sources reported the contrary.


The accusations were raised in parliament by shadow attorney-general, Vickie Chapman, who said: “WorkCover alleges that it has spent more than $700,000 on prosecution costs in the case of Thompson v Duffin. The case has been thrown out by the Full Court of the Supreme Court on the grounds that the prosecution, which was directed by WorkCover and not by the DPP, acted improperly. 


"The justices of the Supreme Court identified in their judgment that the case bore all the hallmarks of a win-at-all-costs approach and that WorkCover has no prosecuting guidelines such as those which are almost universally applicable to state prosecuting authorities and which are designed.” 


In response to the allegations, South Australian attorney-general, Michael Atkinson, agreed with Chapman, saying: “I share her concerns.”


He added: “The prosecution was done by the private law firm Johnson Winter & Slattery. The judgment is a condemnation of their methods. I think that WorkCover would be well advised to look towards the Crown to do future prosecutions. I think that policy change suggests itself in the judgment.


“When I first came to office as attorney-general, the crown thought that there was a move to privatise their work, to farm it out to private legal firms; in fact, many members of the Crown Solicitor's Office seemed pessimistic about their future. I never entertained for a moment privatising the work of the Crown Solicitor's Office. My view is that the Crown Solicitor's Office does an outstanding job and that any well-run government would rely on in-house government lawyers who take a whole-of-government perspective.” 


Slattery said he was unable to comment on the case, as it was an ongoing issue, but was adamant the figures quoted in the media and parliament were incorrect. 


“I don’t know where they come from,” he said. “The number they have is wrong.” 


Julia Davison, CEO of WorkCover SA, said the decision to employ Johnson Winter & Slattery for the case against Thompson, was based on WorkCovers’ obligation to the workers they represent. 

“WorkCover appoints legal representation on a case by case basis, utilising firms that have a prosecutorial background and knowledge of the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986,” she said. 


"WorkCover is responsible for ensuring compliance with our state's workers rehabilitation and compensation legislation. Part of this responsibility includes taking steps to thoroughly investigate allegations of fraud against the scheme and, where appropriate, initiate court proceedings."


The case started in the Adelaide Magistrates Court on August 13, 2004, and ended on September 4 of this year in front of the South Australian Supreme Court. 


The leader of the opposition, Isobel Redmond, did not return The New Lawyers calls in time for publication. 

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Firm denies $700k costing for WorkCover
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Violence
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...