find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Firm's report under scrutiny as client left red faced

Firm's report under scrutiny as client left red faced

A major US law firm's report into gender and pay disparities by a major client is likely to be subpoenaed, raising issues around lawyer-client privilege and pulling the law firm itself into the courtroom._x000D_

A major US law firm’s report into gender and pay disparities by a client is likely to be subpoenaed, raising issues around lawyer-client privilege and pulling the law firm itself into the courtroom.

Six years before the biggest sex discrimination case in US history was filed against Wal-Mart Stores, the company hired major law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld to examine its vulnerability.

The role of that law firm, and its 1995 report suggesting women employed by the client earned less than men in numerous job categories, is now under review by media, and a class action filed on behalf of the women who worked at the company.

The New York Times reports on the early role of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in a major sex discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores. The lawyers warned the company that it would be difficult to defend its practices in the 1995 report.

Without significant changes, the lawyers said in their confidential analysis, Wal-Mart “would find it difficult to fashion a persuasive explanation for disproportionate employment patterns”.

While Wal-Mart has denied any systematic discrimination, wanting the claims against it to be tried individually rather than a class action potentially sweeping in more than a million current and former employees, the lower court have ruled the case can proceed as a class action.

Wal-Mart now plans to ask the country's Supreme Court to overturn the class certification.

Akin Gump’s report is now being dragged into the spotlight. While outside legal experts say the report is likely to be protected by lawyer-client privilege, Brad Seligman, the lead lawyer for the omen suing Wal-Mart says he intends to subpoena the report, which he had previously not known about.

Wal-Mart, meanwhile, labels Akin Gump’s port “stale” and “deeply flawed”. The confidential and privileges report was made available to The New York Times by someone not involved in the lawsuit, who claimed Wal-Mart had not done enough to address the issues the report had raised.

Akin Gump estimated that for 1993 alone, Wal-Mart’s potential legal exposure in a class-action sex discrimination suit was $185 million to $740 million. Seligman said the women suing Wal-Mart were seeking damages for every year since 1997, meaning the company could be on the hook for billions of dollars.

Wal-Mart, meanwhile, criticised Akin Gump’s methodology, arguing it had mimicked the statistical analysis done by plaintiffs’ lawyers in class-action cases.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017


Firm's report under scrutiny as client left red faced
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...