find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Looking beyond the law firm

Looking beyond the law firm

Through exploring alternative options for legal document review, especially for large scale projects, lawyers can achieve significantly reduced costs to their clients, but they must look outside the firm.

ADVERTORIAL


The impact of litigation support technology in increasing law firm productivity is no secret, law firms have avidly adopted the strategic use of technology in litigation, and passed on to their client’s time and costs savings.  Several top-tier Australian firms have developed impressive in-house litigation support capabilities, creating teams dedicated to applied legal technology and working to ensure litigation projects run seamlessly. The majority of firms have chosen to establish close partnerships with external litigation support providers, outsourcing legal technology support based on the size or complexity of the litigation project.  

Yet, despite smart technologies that assist in filtering and identifying relevant information, legal document review costs, the predominate cost in the litigation budget continue to rise, why? Even the most advanced technologies are being outrun by the dramatic increase in electronic information. Whilst the majority of data collected can be culled, categorised and even relevance ranked, there still remains a considerable amount of data requiring review by the human legal mind.

This presents to the legal industry a significant challenge, the obstacle of increased volumes of relevant data and the resulting increased cost, and all this despite the application of intelligent technologies to cull and streamline. Couple this with persistent pressure on firms to reduce a client’s litigation spend and searching for more cost effective options to complete the task of document review.  Enter the non-traditional legal service provider, offering a range of services that go beyond the law firm, namely outsourced subjective document review.

Outsourced subjective document review has been an accepted and well utilised service in the US and EU, however both Australia and the UK have been much slower to adopt the process. This was largely due to the smaller scale and frequency of litigation within Australia, meaning high volume document review teams were not necessarily required, or at the very least required regularly.  However, with the increasing volume of information to review, even for smaller matters, Australian firms are now motivated to look for a solution that achieves high quality results, but reduces litigation spend for their client.

What exactly is outsourced subjective review?  It is the process of contracting an external provider to conduct the review of legal documents to determine information relating to privilege, confidentiality and relevance of documents to the legal issues of the case.  Rates charged for outsourced subjective document review may be on per document or per hour basis, with complexity and depth of review determining the most appropriate price model.  The success of this outsourced document review model is yet to be tested in a sustainable way in Australia; however it is certain the evolution of such services is the next step in non-traditional litigation support and one to watch in the legal market.

 

To learn more about subjective document review and how it can benefit you, come along to e.law’s in-house (CLE) educational seminar on 24th November, 6pm, Level 3, 9 Castlereagh Street, Sydney. More details can be found on elaw.com.au

Written by: Bree Galvin, General Manager of e.law Asia Pacific

elaw.com.au

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Looking beyond the law firm
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...