find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Lawyers voice views on High Court SA decision

Lawyers voice views on High Court SA decision

Lawyers have responded to the High Court ruling relating to the SA laws used to declare the Finks Motor Cycle Club a criminal organisation and impose control orders on two of its members.

THE peak body representing Australian lawyers has commented on the significant High Court ruling relating to the South Australian laws used to declare the Finks Motor Cycle Club a criminal organisation and impose control orders on two of its members.

Yesterday, the High Court confirmed the decision of the South Australian Supreme Court that Section 14(1) of the South Australian Serious and Organised Crime (Control) Act is invalid.

Section 14(1) requires a magistrates court, on application by the Commissioner of Police, to issue a control order against a person if the court is satisfied the defendant is a member of a criminal organisation, as declared by the Attorney-General.

The High Court found the provision invalid because it required the court to act as little more than a rubber stamp for the decisions and actions of the South Australian Government and therefore interfered with the independence and impartiality of the court.

Law Council president, Glenn Ferguson, said the decision demonstrates the vigilance with which the integrity and independence of the courts is safeguarded in Australia.

“The judgment shows that the High Court will not tolerate government regulation which attempts to provide a veneer of judicial legitimacy to what is, in effect, a purely Executive process,” he said.

However, Ferguson also noted that the matter was decided on relatively narrow grounds and that the court was not concerned with evaluating the legislation from either a public policy or human rights perspective.

The Law Council has a number of concerns with the South Australian legislation, and similar legislation which is in operation in other jurisdictions, which the court was not required or even able to consider.

“The so called anti-bikie laws, which have spread across Australia, are an unfortunate example of Australia’s anti-terror laws creeping into and influencing ordinary law enforcement.” Ferguson said.

“These laws try to shift the focus of criminal liability from a person’s conduct to their associations. As a result they have the potential to unduly burden freedom of association. They also have a disproportionately harsh effect on certain sections of the population who may be exposed to the risk of criminal sanction simply because of their family or community connections.”

The Law Council said legislation of this type assumes that clear lines can and should be drawn between a certain criminal class and the rest of society.

“Unfortunately this does not reflect the reality of our community where in extended family groups, public housing, the workplace, pubs, clubs and other formal and informal community organisations, the lives of people intersect.

“The fight against organised crime is an important one, but it’s vital we implement legislation that does not diminish the rights and freedoms of the Australian people or turn traditional notions of criminal justice on their head.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers voice views on High Court SA decision
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...