find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Lawyers tut-tut over Prosperity court decision

Lawyers tut-tut over Prosperity court decision

Lawyers are puffing at the chest after a NSW Supreme Court case has highlighted their importance in choosing professional indemnity cover.

LAWYERS are puffing at the chest after a NSW Supreme Court case has highlighted their importance in choosing professional indemnity cover. 


Newcastle-based financial services firm Prosperity Advisers was placed in the hands of administrators after it became involved in a battle with its former professional indemnity insurer over legal claims from dissatisfied investors. 


The dispute with Prosperity's former professional indemnity insurer relates to advice given to Prosperity clients in 2004-05. Some investors lost money after following this advise. More than 160 clients sued the company for negligently advising them to invest, which resulted in  $17 million in losses.  The firm referred the claims to its professional indemnity insurer, called Dexta. 


What the company has labelled a "technicality" meant the professional indemnity insurer would only cover a portion of the claims. 


Prosperity’s insurer rejected the broker’s view that only one deductible of $40,000 was payable on the entire matter, and instead, required separate deductibles to be paid for each investor’s claim.

Law firm Colin Biggers & Paisley claims the case demonstrates that organisations that rely solely on a broker and do not seek legal advice on the adequacy of their insurance policies are taking careless risks.


According to the law firm, the Court found that the insurance broker who provided incorrect advice to the director of a firm of financial planners, on the legal effect of a policy’s excess provisions in the course of arranging professional indemnity cover for the firm, had breached his duty of care. 

Kemsley Brennan, special counsel at Colin Biggers & Paisley said assessing whether an insurance policy effectively meets the needs of a business requires a lawyer’s input.  

"You cannot determine a business’s real exposures, if you’re not qualified to identify potential liabilities in employment and customer contracts. And you cannot advise on whether deductibles or limits are appropriate unless you have a strong understanding of insurance law principles,” said Brennan.

“The bottom line is that directors should always have a lawyer review the organisation’s insurance program and map it against the business’s needs. A good insurance lawyer will then identify coverage gaps and arm the organisation with the knowledge to ensure they ask the right questions of their broker, to get the insurance product that’s ultimately right for them. 

“The right policy can mean the difference between business insolvency and success, so it’s important for organisations to get a lawyer involved at an early stage as a vital complement to their broker’s services,” he said. 

The Court found the broker had breached his duty of care to Prosperity.

Brennan said that ultimately however, Prosperity’s negligence claim did not succeed, as it could not identify an alternative insurance product available at the time that imposed a single deductible.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers tut-tut over Prosperity court decision
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...