Login
Andrew Jennings
A leading sports lawyer has called on the integrity panels set up to investigate recent scandals in Australian sport to act within the rules and procedures of the sport in question.
The call comes after Swimming Australia’s decision to establish an integrity unit following admissions of misbehaviour and unauthorised use of the drug Stilnox by the Australian 4x100m swimming team prior to the London Olympics last year.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
The Australian Olympic Committee (AOC), also investigating the allegations of drug use and bullying during the Olympic campaign, will appoint a QC with a view to holding the swimmers to account for their actions.
Tim Fuller (pictured), of Walsh Halligan Douglas Lawyers, has told Lawyers Weekly that, although integrity panels are a vital part of weeding out doping and misbehaviour in Australian sport, they must themselves play within the rules.
“The integrity commission must act within the rules and procedures of sports. They cannot be a sort of lone wolf, going off by themselves wielding unlimited power,” said Fuller.
“It’s really important they follow due process and respect things like athlete privacy … the human rights of athletes should be respected.”
The AOC has warned the swimmers that they could also be in breach of the ethical behaviour by-law in its team agreement.
“We support Swimming Australia’s decision to establish an integrity panel to investigate allegations of drunkenness, misuse of prescription drugs, bullying and other breaches of Swimming Australia’s team agreement,” said AOC secretary-general Craig Philips in a statement last month.
The sanctions for the swimmers could extend to withdrawing funding won in the lead up to the Rio Olympics in 2016, said Philips.
Fuller’s view is that Swimming Australia, like many other national sporting organisations, has failed to define the type of behaviour that constitutes bringing their sport into disrepute or contempt.
“Most sporting organisations keep the clause in relation to behaviour as broad as possible,” says Fuller.
He adds that it’s an “unusual move” by the AOC to hire a QC to investigate these incidents further.
“I think it’s a bit unnecessary, but then again, the perception is sometimes as valuable as the outcome,” said Fuller.
“I find it unusual to bring in a QC, because everything is very well governed in relation to Swimming Australia. They’ve got team agreements, which pretty much govern the relationship between the swimmer and them.”
