find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Corporate and rights lawyers at loggerheads

Corporate and rights lawyers at loggerheads

An employment law partner said businesses will be spared “speculative” discrimination claims after the Gillard Government shelved its Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill, while a peak rights body has claimed the move threatens the Federal human rights framework.

Nick Duggal (pictured), who heads up TressCox Lawyers’ employment and industrial relations practice, told Lawyers Weekly that business owners will breathe a sigh of relief in the wake of Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’ announcement that proposed reforms to anti-discrimination laws will be put on hold.

At a media briefing yesterday (21 March), Dreyfus said the Bill required “deeper consideration” after a Senate Committee received almost 500 submissions in response to the draft legislation from individuals and organisations, including the Law Council of Australia (LCA).

Duggal criticised the Bill’s reversal of the burden of proof to the person accused of discrimination and possible restrictions on behaviour deemed to be ‘offensive’ as “burdensome” and “wholly subjective”.

“The test of what constitutes unfavourable treatment would have been troublesome for employers and I would have anticipated a rise in claims,” he said, nominating gender and age discrimination as areas most likely invite legal action.

Duggal said claims would probably have arisen out of “legitimate disciplinary processes”, such as warnings, demotions or performance-based dismissals.

“If [employees] possess a particular protected attribute they may seek to rely upon that attribute to assert that action taken against them was discrimination, and then the onus then shifts to the employer who has to prove that [the action was taken] for a different reason,” he argued.

The Human Rights Law Centre (HLRC) dismissed the argument as a poor excuse for abandoning the reforms.

Hugh de Kretser, HLRC’s executive director, said the government had already indicated it would remove or amend the Bill’s controversial ‘offence’ clause that caused concern during consultation phase. A minor amendment addressing this point would have been sufficient, he added.

De Kretser claimed the decision to delay the reforms is a failure by the Government to deliver on a key plank of its Human Rights Frameworka suite of reforms introduced in response to a national inquiry in 2009.

“Another pillar of the Government’s human rights framework is under threat, this time at a final critical hurdle after years of work and investment by those working in the discrimination system and representing vulnerable groups,” he said.

“The political reality is the choice to delay these reforms means effectively abandoning their introduction before the election.”

But Duggal believes the Attorney-General has acted appropriately to ensure the proposed legislation respects the interests of both political parties, “rather than push something out on the basis of an election timetable”.

The LCA has also supported the Attorney-General’s decision to delay the reforms. LCA president Joseph Catanzariti said the government had recognised the complexities involved in consolidating the five existing anti-discrimination Acts and the need for further consultation.

Despite the Bill being sent back to the parliamentary drawing board, Dreyfus announced that amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act would be introduced this week to protect against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status.

“The Government will proceed immediately with the new protection while detailed work continues on consolidating Australia’s anti-discrimination laws,” he said.

The new protections build on the Labor Government’s 2008 reforms to 85 Commonwealth Acts that were considered discriminatory to same-sex couples and their children.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Corporate and rights lawyers at loggerheads
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice, ALA, right-to-die law
Oct 24 2017
‘Right-to-die’ laws would be a relief for terminally ill: ALA
The passage of an assisted dying bill through the lower house of Victorian Parliament has been haile...
Oct 24 2017
Diversity top of agenda for future WA Law Society president
The advancement of diversity in the Western Australian legal profession will be one of the key items...
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...