find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Sedition a bad word in anti-terror law: ALRC

Sedition a bad word in anti-terror law: ALRC

THE AUSTRALIAN Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) report on sedition laws was tabled in parliament last week, with many controversial elements of the legislation having been watered down.ALRC…

THE AUSTRALIAN Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) report on sedition laws was tabled in parliament last week, with many controversial elements of the legislation having been watered down.

ALRC president Professor David Weisbrot said the law could be drastically improved if the term ‘sedition’ was discarded in favour of a focus on anti-violence measures.

“We found that there is a real problem in the current law’s continued use of the word ‘sedition’, which is historically associated with stifling and punishing criticism of the established authority. Once you get beyond the term, there is support for the basic thrust of the new offences,” Weisbrot said.

The ALRC report, Fighting Words: A Review of Sedition Laws in Australia, made 27 recommendations for reform of the legislation. Along with ditching the “red rag” term ‘sedition’, they include requiring the Crown to prove that a person urged others to use force or violence against community groups or the institutions of democratic government, and with the intention that this violence would eventuate; and to lead a process through the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General to reform state and territory laws in this area “which mostly are a good deal worse than the federal law,” Weisbrot said.

According to the ALRC, media commentators, satirists, artists and activists need no longer be concerned their conduct will land them in breach of the law, so long as they don’t encourage the use of violence.

The five-month consultation by the ALRC into the sedition laws made “it plain that we need a clear distinction in the law between free speech and conduct calculated to incite violence in the community — which properly should be the subject of the criminal law,” Weisbrot said.

“Context is critical in these circumstances, so under our recommendations, courts would be required to take into account whether the conduct was a part of artistic expression; or genuine academic or scientific discussion; or a news report or commentary.”

Attorney-General Philip Ruddock welcomed the report, after having announced the ALRC would review the new sedition offences in Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005 and related offences in Part IIA of the Crimes Act 1914 in March of this year.

“The [ALRC] recognised that by modernising the offences, the government had sensibly shifted the focus away from critical statements to conduct urging others to use force or violence to overthrow the government or to target particular groups within the community,” Ruddock said.

The government will carefully consider the ALRC’s report in an effort to ensure there are appropriate Commonwealth offences to deal with such conduct, Ruddock said. Shadow Attorney-General Nicola Roxon responded by labelling the legislation “clumsy” and “poorly drafted”.

Further important recommendations in the report include amending the offences of “assisting” the enemy to clarify that this refers to material assistance, such as providing arms, funds, personnel or strategic information; outright repeal of the outdated unlawful associations provisions in the Crimes Act, which have been superseded by recent terrorist organisation-related laws; and reviewing old related offences, such as treachery and sabotage, to decide if they should be repealed or modernised.

“Technically, the laws must be drafted in sufficiently precise terms to ensure they cannot be applied inappropriately or used in a way that would infringe upon freedom of expression — whether directly or by prompting artists or commentators to self-censor for fear of prosecution,” Weisbrot said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Sedition a bad word in anti-terror law: ALRC
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...