find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
No lesson from UK on CSR

No lesson from UK on CSR

AUSTRALIAN LAWYERS are not in favour of changing directors’ duties as a way of ensuring Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), a conference determined last week.Reforms to directors’ duties…

AUSTRALIAN LAWYERS are not in favour of changing directors’ duties as a way of ensuring Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), a conference determined last week.

Reforms to directors’ duties currently being debated in the United Kingdom would not improve the Corporations Act 2001, according to a majority of lawyers in the audience.

“My take at the end of the conference is that most of the lawyers present seemed to me to be very sceptical as to whether an amendment of the kind that is being introduced in the United Kingdom [would be suitable for Australian law],” said Alan Cameron AM of Blake Dawson Waldron, who participated in the conference.

Held in Banco Court, the conference was jointly hosted by the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Law Society of New South Wales, with the theme “Should Australia follow the UK approach to directors’ social responsibility?”.

The UK debate was summarised by key note speaker the Right Hon Lady Justice M H Arden, DBE, who is a member of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, a distinguished company lawyer, and the former chair of the Law Commission of England and Wales. In Australia at the invitation of Allens Arthur Robinson, Arden has made an integral contribution to the debate over the reform of the UK directors’ duty of good faith under clause 158 (now clause 173).

June McPhie, president of the Law Society of NSW described the proposed changes as “the most significant reform in the UK company law for several decades”. But Cameron said the reforms would not be advantageous for Australian company law.

“Clause 173 did not impress the room for several reasons. First, I think there is a degree of scepticism as to whether any change is necessary in Australia at all, or indeed in the United Kingdom, but secondly … [because] corporations are capable of behaving responsibly and behaving as good citizens, without the necessity to make the changes that are being contemplated in the UK,” he said.

The Hon Chris Pearce, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, spoke of the government’s support of the need for corporations to embrace CSR as a means of achieving sustainable business practices. He cited, by way of example, government initiatives such as the Prime Minister’s Community Business Partnership and work being done by the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) and the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) on Corporations and Financial Services.

The PJC final report on its inquiry into CSR, released in June, did not recommend changes to the directors’ duties provisions of the Corporations Act. CAMAC is due to release its views on the issue later in the year.

Pearce said “the government will examine the [PJC’s] findings, along with the advice from CAMAC, before taking a decision on whether we need to further clarify the current regulatory framework”.

But according to Pearce, the government had already provided significant support to business, which enables corporations to behave responsibly, especially where stakeholders are involved.

“Company directors need to take into account the interests of stakeholders when making decisions in the interests of companies. Our current regulatory framework supports this goal,” he said.

McPhie said the need for a proper consideration of CSR, whether as a mandatory legal obligation or a voluntary measure, is one which cannot be ignored.

“Corporate Social Responsibility has become a timely issue of critical importance enhanced by the events associated with the James Hardie Group and the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services Inquiry,” she said.

Although Pearce agreed on grounds of business sustainability, he warned that it “is paramount to ensure that if changes were implemented in regard to director duties, that they would actually deliver improved outcomes for all stakeholders and not in fact impede potential growth and stifle opportunities”.

According to Pearce, there was already an indication that businesses were doing a good job in regulating their own behaviour.

“Over the last ten years or so, there has been a marked change in attitude. Corporations now embrace the idea of contributing socially and environmentally, as well as economically, to our country,” he said.

The conference marked the first occasion that the Law Society and the Supreme Court have jointly hosted an event. McPhie said that the conference was a positive experience, and one that the Law Society hopes to repeat in the future.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

No lesson from UK on CSR
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...