find the latest legal job
Monash University Director Workplace Relations
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Exceptional senior leadership role
View details
Personal Injury Lawyer - Melbourne Eastern Suburbs - 2-5 years PAE
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Lilydale VIC 3140
· Fulfilling role as part of a small team in a positive workplace
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· In-house opportunity · Be part of our engine for success in a high growth business
View details
Trainer/Assessor Diploma of Legal Services
Category: Other | Location: Liverpool NSW 2170
· 3 Days Per Week · 9am - 4pm
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Adelaide CBD · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

A former Perth lawyer who racially abused a court security officer, calling him a “Singapore prick”, has been ordered to pay $12,500 in compensation.

A Federal Circuit Court decision handed down this week (25 September) found Megan in de Braekt, who was struck from the roll earlier this year, engaged in unlawful conduct under the Racial Discrimination Act.

Slater & Gordon represented Rajandran Kanapathy, a security supervisor at Perth’s Central Law Courts building. He gave evidence that In de Braekt became abusive after she refused a request for a security search of her handbag on 16 January 2009.

The then lawyer told Kanapathy that she knew he was from Singapore and that he ought to go back to his country. She also labelled him a “prick” several times and said he had “short man’s syndrome”.

The incident was one of a number of matters the Supreme Court considered before a judgment in April ordering In de Braekt’s name to be removed from the roll of legal practitioners in WA.

In Wednesday’s Federal Circuit Court decision, Judge Toni Lucev noted that the case had been “bitterly contested” by In de Braekt.

In response to the original complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission, In de Braekt denied the incident occurred, claiming that at no time did she see or communicate with Kanapathy on 16 January 2009.

Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network