find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

A former Perth lawyer who racially abused a court security officer, calling him a “Singapore prick”, has been ordered to pay $12,500 in compensation.

A Federal Circuit Court decision handed down this week (25 September) found Megan in de Braekt, who was struck from the roll earlier this year, engaged in unlawful conduct under the Racial Discrimination Act.

Slater & Gordon represented Rajandran Kanapathy, a security supervisor at Perth’s Central Law Courts building. He gave evidence that In de Braekt became abusive after she refused a request for a security search of her handbag on 16 January 2009.

The then lawyer told Kanapathy that she knew he was from Singapore and that he ought to go back to his country. She also labelled him a “prick” several times and said he had “short man’s syndrome”.

The incident was one of a number of matters the Supreme Court considered before a judgment in April ordering In de Braekt’s name to be removed from the roll of legal practitioners in WA.

In Wednesday’s Federal Circuit Court decision, Judge Toni Lucev noted that the case had been “bitterly contested” by In de Braekt.

In response to the original complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission, In de Braekt denied the incident occurred, claiming that at no time did she see or communicate with Kanapathy on 16 January 2009.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...