find the latest legal job
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker

A former Perth lawyer who racially abused a court security officer, calling him a “Singapore prick”, has been ordered to pay $12,500 in compensation.

A Federal Circuit Court decision handed down this week (25 September) found Megan in de Braekt, who was struck from the roll earlier this year, engaged in unlawful conduct under the Racial Discrimination Act.

Slater & Gordon represented Rajandran Kanapathy, a security supervisor at Perth’s Central Law Courts building. He gave evidence that In de Braekt became abusive after she refused a request for a security search of her handbag on 16 January 2009.

The then lawyer told Kanapathy that she knew he was from Singapore and that he ought to go back to his country. She also labelled him a “prick” several times and said he had “short man’s syndrome”.

The incident was one of a number of matters the Supreme Court considered before a judgment in April ordering In de Braekt’s name to be removed from the roll of legal practitioners in WA.

In Wednesday’s Federal Circuit Court decision, Judge Toni Lucev noted that the case had been “bitterly contested” by In de Braekt.

In response to the original complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission, In de Braekt denied the incident occurred, claiming that at no time did she see or communicate with Kanapathy on 16 January 2009.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyer fined for racially abusing court worker
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Anti-radicalisation programs playing ‘second fiddle’ to terrorism laws
Several academics have questioned the balance between Australia’s counterterrorism legislation and...
 William Ah Ket
‘Bamboo ceiling’ thought piece wins inaugural law prize
A paper that explores the idea of affirmative action to achieve greater diversity among members of A...
Nov 22 2017
Reduced investment protections will make robust commercial arbitration mechanisms all the more critical for investors
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the current trend away from investor protect...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...