find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Not enough work for judges in top court

Not enough work for judges in top court

NEW ZEALAND’S Supreme Court judges appear to have too little to do and are frustrated at their light workload. Almost two years after the Court’s first sitting, its five judges, regarded as the…

NEW ZEALAND’S Supreme Court judges appear to have too little to do and are frustrated at their light workload.

Almost two years after the Court’s first sitting, its five judges, regarded as the high priests of the legal profession, have yet to tackle a full workload.

In the past 17 months, the Court has delivered only 17 substantive judgments, many of which are not more than 30 paragraphs.

The Court replaced the Privy Council as New Zealand’s final appellate court in October 2004.

Ironically, New Zealand’s next-highest court, the Court of Appeal, with eight judges, is snowed under with cases.

One of New Zealand’s top lawyers, who asked not to be named, said he knew the Supreme Court judges would prefer to have more to do.

“It probably frustrates the hell out of them. These are people who have spent their whole working lives overcommitted and under stress. Now, probably the most stressful thing is that they are not sitting on many days,” he said.

“But it’s almost a vote of confidence in the court below because the Supreme Court is refusing leave (to appeal) except in very important cases. It looks like it’s not doing very much, but structurally it’s doing the right thing.”

Former ACT MP Steven Franks, who opposed setting up the Supreme Court, said he had heard “mutterings” from the Court of Appeal about its workload compared with the higher court.

A prominent Christchurch lawyer said he was aware of the frustration felt by Supreme Court judges about their workload, “but for all that, the amount of work is increasing”.

“You don’t want to be judging too soon. It’s better those frustrations than being too busy and not doing it well enough,” he said.

The workload issue rears its head at a time when the Government has approved a purpose-built Supreme Court as a symbol of national identity.

No exact costs for the building have been mentioned, but it is believed the Government expects to get little change from $40 million. The court has an operational budget of about $2.1 million.

Last year, Chief Justice Sian Elias, who was not available for comment yesterday, balked at resources for her court and criticised a proposal to convert the old High Court building in Wellington into the Supreme Court. She took issue with the proposed layout, room sizes and security.

The Supreme Court delivered 10 substantive judgments that involved 28 days of hearings, last year. So far this year it has issued seven major decisions involving nine days of hearings.

The Australian High Court, with seven judges, issued about 70 decisions last year, and Britain’s top court, the House of Lords, with 12 judges, delivered about 80.

The Court of Appeal dealt with 477 criminal cases, 125 civil criminal appeals and 140 miscellaneous motions last year.

Justice Ministry figures showed the Supreme Court has an annual budget of about $2.1 million. It has five full-time administrative staff, a registrar, two case officers, a research librarian and a part-time library assistant. Each judge has a law clerk and a personal secretary.

The Chief Justice is paid $335,000 a year and her fellow Supreme Court judges are paid $313,000. Their notable decisions so far include rulings on the Ahmed Zaoui case and ACT’s expulsion of MP Donna Awatere Huata.

Franks, who is now a law consultant, said the Privy Council had averaged about 11 cases a year and “we would have expected our court to be under-utilised. It’s a bit like Nauru buying a Boeing 737”.

“While it may seem they are twiddling their thumbs and is a waste of resource, it’s actually quite a good sign we haven’t suddenly decided to waste our money appealing things a lot higher.”

The Supreme Court’s workload had not built up as quickly as it would have if the Court of Appeal had not been bogged down with cases, he said.

Professor John Burrows, a Canterbury University law lecturer and barrister, said the Supreme Court was still in its early stages.

“The numbers do not suggest a large workload, but it does suggest they have got time to reflect on their decisions — time the lower courts don’t have,” he said. “It could be a greater workload, but that will come as the judgments start to come in.”

Reproduced with permission of The Press, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Not enough work for judges in top court
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...