find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
A change would do you good

A change would do you good

Law firms need to embrace change, Robert Milliner, a former chief executive partner of King & Wood Mallesons, said at the Australasian Legal Practice Management Association (ALPMA) Summit last week.

“[Clients] want more for less delivered in a different way,” said Milliner (pictured), a senior advisor at UBS and the current B20 Sherpa for Australia , when giving his talk entitled Where are you leading your firm?, at the Summit in Sydney’s Entertainment and Convention Centre last Friday (18 October).

Milliner said that the GFC caused a seismic shift in the legal market in Australia and worldwide.

“We’ve seen an increase in in-house legal departments as a better and cheaper way of doing things, and that increase in in-house legal departments isn’t just influenced by cost ... during the GFC there was pressure on corporate businesses [and] it actually drove in-house legal departments much closer to the corporate function, and that has created a different relationship than that which existed in 2008.”

Milliner added that technology and the entrance of global firms to the Australian market have also had major impacts on law firms.

“We’ve got to think globally and across markets and the competitive rivalry [in Australia] is intense,” said Milliner. “What that means is that this market is no longer as attractive [to global firms] as it was.”

Bad copies

Milliner also criticised what he described as the “mini-me” approach that has existed among Australian firms up to now; where a firm simply identified its most successful competitor and copied what it was doing.

“That will no longer work in this market,” he said. “If all that you are doing is copying a rival you can’t be very successful.”

“The only way to get more-than-average profits in a competitive market is to be different and more competitive than the others,” he added.

“If you stop innovating you will be eaten up by everybody else that innovates around you.”

Milliner also said that he doesn’t believe any firms will go out of business in the next year or two “unless they’ve done something radically stupid”, but that he thinks profits will continue to fall.

“Firms need to do some purely strategic thinking ... far beyond budgets [and ask] why is your firm there?”

Milliner added that firms need to look at what is unique about their firm and about legal practice generally – what are the parts that cannot be replaced by competitors from outside the legal industry.

“If you look at where we are now, the most successful area for a lot of firms is litigation,” said Milliner. “Not the traditional discovery part ... but the advocacy part.

“It’s not easily substituted, you can’t have other people providing that service, and barriers to entry around advocacy skills are quite high,” he added.

Leading from the back

Milliner also said that firms need to look at their leadership structure and take a whole-of-firm rather than a hierarchical approach to leadership.

“It’s informal leadership that has the power to drive the biggest organisational changes [and] good leaders look to encourage others to lead.”

He added that firms that fail to allow leadership “from below” are wasting talent.  

“Firms have got bundles of incredibly well-educated, highly-intelligent, capable people who are underutilised in [a leadership] sense because what they are told to do is write legal advice.”

 

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

A change would do you good
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Consultation
06:04
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
IBA
06:03
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
06:00
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...