find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Do we need quotas for female judges?

Do we need quotas for female judges?

andrew-lynch

Federal Court judge Michelle Gordon became the fifth woman to be appointed to the High Court in more than 100 years this month, raising the question of whether action is necessary to ensure diversity in the judiciary.

Her appointment brings the number of female judges to three out of seven, returning the even split of genders that prevailed before Justice Geoffrey Nettle replaced outgoing Justice Susan Crennan in December 2014.

“There was some concern that perhaps the female membership was on the decline and that has clearly not been the case,” Professor Andrew Lynch (pictured) from UNSW told Lawyers Weekly.

After the High Court male-female ratio dropped to 5-2 in 2014, some in the profession argued that there should be a quota to assure equal representation of women.

“I didn’t feel that was necessary, but it would be good to see a convention develop that the Court should have as near to an equal gender split as is possible,” Professor Lynch said.

Although little over a decade ago all the judges on the High Court were men, appointing equal numbers of men and women has quickly become accepted practice.

The political backlash in 2003 after the Howard government appointed Dyson Heydon to replace the court’s first woman, Mary Gaudron, has meant that no reasonable government would seriously consider failing to address the issue of gender balance in the High Court.

“The spectre of having an all-male final court … just look[s] so unsatisfactory,” said Professor Lynch. “Even though for much of the 20th century that was the norm, really no government would countenance the idea that the final court should be absent of faces which represent 50 per cent of the community.”

At some level, the whole point of an appellate court having a larger panel of judges is to allow for disagreement and diversity of opinion, he continued.

“Why establish a court with seven judges if the idea is that on every occasion those seven judges will say exactly the same thing?

“The idea is that the matters they hear are at the pointy end of complexity and [will] benefit from an exchange of different viewpoints and perspectives.”

Professor Lynch said it was important that the judiciary resembles the community and that this was particularly crucial in the High Court, given the court’s prominence at the apex of Australia’s judicial system.

Although the empirical research is often inconclusive, it is the experience of many judges that diversity contributes to merit.

“You get a richer quality of judicial decision-making in a system where there are voices informed by those different experiences and perspectives,” Professor Lynch said.

Courts across the country

One additional female judge on the High Court does little to address the absence of women in the judiciary more broadly, according to Professor Lynch.

“The High Court gets a lot of attention as the national court, [but] I don’t think we can look at it say that there isn’t work remaining to be done more generally,” he said.

The Victorian Government brought in a 50 per cent quota for women in all courts in March, to address the fact that only a third of Victorian judges are women.

The proportion of female judges ranges from 28-37 per cent in all states and territories except the ACT, where 55 per cent of judges are women, according to the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration.

One of the problems is that politicians are often uncomfortable talking about diversity when making judicial appointments, preferring to focus on merit to prevent any suggestion of tokenism.

This diversity-blindness “tends to prop up fairly established patterns of appointment”, Professor Lynch said. It also goes against the grain of a lot of emerging academic literature and the experience of judges, which indicates that who the judge is actually matters, he added.

“If you talk to any member of the profession they will acknowledge that judges are not robots, they are different people and they bring to the task of adjudication different life experiences.”

The sole female member of the 12-member UK Supreme Court, Baroness Brenda Hale, for instance, has been very candid in saying that her gender has made a difference in some of her judgements, he said.

“She has also pointed out that her gender is not the only way it is different; the fact that she has an academic background as well as [being] a family lawyer rather than, say, a commercial lawyer [also sets her apart].”

Quotas are not the only way to ensure diversity of gender, ethnicity, race, professional background and residential location, according to Professor Lynch.

One way to create a more representative judiciary is to develop clear and articulated processes of judicial appointment that express diversity as “an aspiration underpinning those processes”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Do we need quotas for female judges?
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
06:03
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...