find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
How will the Uniform Law affect your practice?

How will the Uniform Law affect your practice?

John-McKenzie

Changes to cost disclosure protocols and complaint time frames are among the Uniform Law provisions that will most affect lawyers, according to the NSW Legal Services Commissioner.

The Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, introduced into federal parliament in May, will unite almost three-quarters of the Australian legal profession under one regulatory umbrella.

The release of the final Legal Profession Uniform Rules yesterday puts the government on track to roll out standardised regulations for NSW and Victoria on 1 July.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly, NSW Legal Services Commissioner John McKenzie (pictured) said there are a few legislative loose ends to tie up before the Uniform Law comes into effect, but that he was confident the July deadline would be met.

Mr McKenzie said there were major changes with which practitioners should familiarise themselves. He intends to work with legal bodies in coming months to raise awareness of the reforms and help the profession adjust.

“There are changes in relation to do’s and don’ts [around] legal fees and costs to clients,” he said. “Cost disclosure is being overhauled, to a certain extent.”

A “new fundamental principle” will govern billing practices under the Uniform Law.

“There must be informed consent by the client about the course that the matter is going to take and how it is going to be run, but also about the estimated costs,” Mr McKenzie said.

“If, during the course of the matter… [an] earlier estimate is no longer accurate but will be exceeded, then the lawyer has an ongoing responsibility to make sure they communicate that to the client.”

This means more than providing clients with “huge, multipage, finely printed cost-disclosure forms”, he continued.

Lawyers are required to make sure the client understands what is being proposed, for instance with a face-to-face or at least a telephone conversation.

“That is perhaps the biggest day-to-day change that the legal profession is going to experience once the Uniform Law comes into operation.”

The Uniform Laws will also put new thresholds in place for cost disclosure. Lawyers will not be required to formally notify clients about costs if estimated to be less than $750. If matters fall between $750 and the upper limit of $3,000, there is a new short form for cost disclosure. Clients must be fully informed of fees that are estimated to exceed $3,000.

“I underline the word estimate; no one can realistically give a formal and binding quote and they are not being asked to,” Mr McKenzie said.

Another change lawyers and clients should be aware of is the reduction in time limits around complaint processes.

“I don’t think it’s a big change,” he said. “There will be some shortening of timeframes. The idea is to try to expedite matters so there is a much earlier resolution and, hopefully, a much lower cost both to the practitioner in his or her time [and] to the client.”

A further reform, which will affect lawyers working in personal injury law, is the removal of the 2005 prohibition on advertising in NSW.

Victoria never introduced legislation restricting advertising by personal injury lawyers. NSW is removing this law by way of compromise to facilitate the union of the two jurisdictions.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

How will the Uniform Law affect your practice?
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...