find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Court orders lawyer to repay $100k in fees

Court orders lawyer to repay $100k in fees

The Western Australian Supreme Court has found a family lawyer overcharged his client, in one instance billing for almost 25 hours in a single day.

The lawyer, identified as Mr K, charged his client, Mr M, a total of $330,000 over the course of a divorce proceeding.

Neither party can be identified as proceedings were in the Family Court.

Supreme Court registrar Christopher Boyle found Mr K’s fees were excessive and ordered the bill to be reduced to $220,000.

Registrar Boyle also found Mr K’s records were unreliable, with one “particularly disturbing” item showing 20 straight hours of research.

“There is no indication of what was being researched,” Registrar Boyle said, according to a report in The Australian.

“Nor, it seems, did this marathon exhaust [him]. Other work is shown as being done on that day, such that the total charged on this one day is 24.8 hours.”

The judgment by Registrar Boyle states Mr K was not an accredited family lawyer and should have engaged specialist counsel.

In addition, as Mr K is a sole practitioner, Registrar Boyle found he frequently charged for work that “did not require the skill of a lawyer”.

Nonetheless, the judgment noted that the conduct of Mr M’s wife and lawyers significantly increased costs, with little attempt made to resolve disputes out of court.

Overall, the former couple accumulated legal fees of more than $1.1 million, which the Family Court judge who heard the case described as “staggering” and “totally disproportionate to the pool of assets”.




Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Court orders lawyer to repay $100k in fees
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...